Don’t Be Rash: The Pediatric Dermatology Podcast

“Beyond the Basics: A Masterclass on Managing Severe Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema)”

Season 2025, Episode 06

“Beyond the Basics: A Masterclass on Managing Severe Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema),” Don’t Be Rash: The Pediatric Dermatology Podcast, S2025, Episode 6

Join Dr. K as he partners with world renown pediatric dermatologist, Dr Robert Sidbury, to discuss their experiences and approach to managing patients with severe atopic dermatitis (eczema). Learn how to optimize topical therapies and get familiar with biologics and other systemic medications – both old and new! This deep-dive episode goes beyond the basics and provides “clinical pearls” from two experts’ who have managed atopic dermatitis from the trenches. Become more informed and better prepared around the topic of severe atopic dermatitis (eczema)!

More About This Podcast

Dr. Andrew Krakowski

Dr. Andrew Krakowski – or “Dr. K” as he is better known to his patients and their families! – is both a board-certified pediatric and adolescent dermatologist as well as a board-certified general dermatologist. He is a lifelong learner, driven by a passion for patient care, education, scientific investigation, and innovation. Dr. Krakowski currently serves as the Network Chair of Dermatology at St. Luke’s University Health Network, and he is the Program Director for the ACGME-approved St. Luke’s Residency in Dermatology.

Robert Sidbury MD, MPH

Chief of Pediatric Dermatology, Seattle Children's Hospital

Robert Sidbury MD, MPH got his undergraduate and medical degrees from Duke University, and his Masters in Public Health from Harvard. He did his internship and residency at UCSF and the Oregon Health and Science University, and completed fellowships at Northwestern University and Harvard. He has held faculty positions at Harvard Medical School and the University of Washington School of Medicine where he is currently Professor in the Department of Pediatrics and chief of the division of dermatology. Dr. Sidbury has authored over 150 publications and 25 book chapters. His clinical and research interests include atopic dermatitis, vascular tumors of infancy, vitamin D, and pediatric health services, and he has experience leading Clinical Guideline efforts including the Atopic Dermatitis Guidelines for the American Academy of Dermatology in 2014 and again currently. Dr Sidbury is on the Scientific Advisory Committee for the American Academy of Dermatology and is Past-President of the Washington State Dermatology Association and the Society for Pediatric Dermatology. He and his wife Sheila are empty nesters and enjoy reading, tennis, and travel. Their three kids Claire, Maddy, and JP are in college or beyond.

Transcript

00:00:02.340 –> 00:00:05.080
Welcome to the Don’t Be Rash Pediatric Dermatology

00:00:05.080 –> 00:00:07.679
Podcast, the owner’s manual for your kid’s skin.

00:00:07.839 –> 00:00:10.820
I’m your host, Dr. K, board-certified pediatric

00:00:10.820 –> 00:00:13.640
dermatologist and father of two boys. I’m here

00:00:13.640 –> 00:00:15.880
to chat with you to promote dermatological education

00:00:15.880 –> 00:00:18.859
and improve skin health in our children everywhere.

00:00:19.500 –> 00:00:29.140
Let’s get started. Welcome to Don’t Be Rash,

00:00:29.359 –> 00:00:31.539
the pediatric dermatology show, coming to you

00:00:31.539 –> 00:00:34.119
from historic Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. I’m your

00:00:34.119 –> 00:00:36.179
host and board-certified pediatric dermatologist,

00:00:36.340 –> 00:00:39.119
Dr. Andrew Krakowski. On today’s show, we’re

00:00:39.119 –> 00:00:41.259
going to continue our deep dive into the world

00:00:41.259 –> 00:00:43.640
of eczema and focus on what it means to have

00:00:43.640 –> 00:00:47.100
severe atopic dermatitis. More specifically,

00:00:47.159 –> 00:00:49.359
in the first half of the show, we will discuss

00:00:49.359 –> 00:00:52.240
what constitutes a diagnosis of severe atopic

00:00:52.240 –> 00:00:54.560
dermatitis and discuss some of the potential

00:00:54.560 –> 00:00:57.329
reasons why a child might end up at that level

00:00:57.329 –> 00:01:00.789
of severity in the first place. Then in the second

00:01:00.789 –> 00:01:02.710
half of the show, we will discuss management

00:01:02.710 –> 00:01:05.189
approaches, including a discussion around systemic

00:01:05.189 –> 00:01:09.150
therapies. Joining us today as our guest co-host

00:01:09.150 –> 00:01:11.310
is world-renowned pediatric dermatologist, Dr.

00:01:11.510 –> 00:01:14.349
Robert Sidbury. Dr. Sidbury is chief of pediatric

00:01:14.349 –> 00:01:16.709
dermatology at Seattle Children’s Hospital in

00:01:16.709 –> 00:01:19.469
Washington State. He’s really been a guiding

00:01:19.469 –> 00:01:21.109
voice in terms of the approach to management

00:01:21.109 –> 00:01:23.790
for patients with severe atopic dermatitis and

00:01:23.790 –> 00:01:26.129
has been a leader on numerous expert panels and

00:01:26.129 –> 00:01:29.209
consensus guidelines on the subject. Welcome,

00:01:29.329 –> 00:01:31.430
Dr. Sidbury. Thanks for joining me today. Thank

00:01:31.430 –> 00:01:33.310
you very much for having me, Dr. Krakowski. It’s

00:01:33.310 –> 00:01:35.569
a pleasure. So what comes to your mind clinically

00:01:35.569 –> 00:01:38.069
when someone asks you about a child suffering

00:01:38.069 –> 00:01:40.689
from severe atopic dermatitis? How’s that different

00:01:40.689 –> 00:01:44.090
from, say, mild or moderate in your mind? Well,

00:01:44.129 –> 00:01:46.909
really just the misery of it, to be honest. It

00:01:46.909 –> 00:01:51.390
is just such an all-encompassing thing with

00:01:51.390 –> 00:01:56.569
sort of incessant itch, chronic sort of scratched

00:01:56.569 –> 00:02:01.420
open skin, risk of infection. and all compounded

00:02:01.420 –> 00:02:05.159
by the sort of injustice of oftentimes those

00:02:05.159 –> 00:02:07.959
who see it, because as you know, eczema is a

00:02:07.959 –> 00:02:11.539
very visible disorder, referring to it as “just

00:02:11.539 –> 00:02:14.219
eczema” – my least favorite two words to put together

00:02:14.219 –> 00:02:17.639
in the dictionary – because it may well capture

00:02:17.639 –> 00:02:20.819
very, very mild eczema that gets better with

00:02:20.819 –> 00:02:24.300
a little petrolatum, but it very much does not

00:02:24.300 –> 00:02:27.280
capture this extent of disease. And I always

00:02:27.280 –> 00:02:30.659
will tell pediatric residents even who rotate

00:02:30.659 –> 00:02:33.699
with us and have that sort of misimpression of

00:02:33.699 –> 00:02:36.159
the impact that this disease can have. It’s like

00:02:36.159 –> 00:02:40.039
if you’ve had some contact dermatitis, a poison

00:02:40.039 –> 00:02:43.599
ivy, or a bug bite, and you’re itching from it,

00:02:43.699 –> 00:02:46.939
it can drive you batty. And that’s a one – or

00:02:46.939 –> 00:02:50.379
two-day proposition. This is a 24/7, 365 deal.

00:02:51.340 –> 00:02:53.259
It is essentially that. Andrew was just sort

00:02:53.259 –> 00:02:55.280
of trying to paint that picture of what severe

00:02:55.280 –> 00:02:57.639
eczema is and how all-encompassing it is and

00:02:57.639 –> 00:03:01.139
the lifestyle changes kids have to make to accommodate

00:03:01.139 –> 00:03:04.460
it. The clothes they can’t wear, the play dates

00:03:04.460 –> 00:03:07.460
they can’t have, the medicines they have to take,

00:03:07.479 –> 00:03:10.460
both topically and systemically. All of that

00:03:10.460 –> 00:03:14.300
sort of gets to this extent. And of course, as

00:03:14.300 –> 00:03:17.360
you know, there are studies require metrics,

00:03:17.699 –> 00:03:20.340
investigator global assessment scores, amount

00:03:20.340 –> 00:03:23.060
of body surface area, depending on what you look

00:03:23.060 –> 00:03:25.360
at, either more than 10 % or 15 % of the body

00:03:25.360 –> 00:03:27.639
surface area. So there are all these ways that

00:03:27.639 –> 00:03:31.039
we capture what is severe eczema, but it’s really

00:03:31.039 –> 00:03:33.620
that big picture of just how impactful it is.

00:03:34.930 –> 00:03:37.370
Certainly, when you talk about body surface area

00:03:37.370 –> 00:03:40.389
and sort of the, you know, is it totally clear,

00:03:40.490 –> 00:03:43.069
mild, moderate, or severe, that misses the entire

00:03:43.069 –> 00:03:46.270
picture of the psychological aspect of the condition

00:03:46.270 –> 00:03:48.889
as well. And I think you alluded to it, but tell

00:03:48.889 –> 00:03:51.150
us a little bit about what severe patients might

00:03:51.150 –> 00:03:54.409
be experiencing from a psychological or psychosocial

00:03:54.409 –> 00:03:57.939
perspective. Oh, it’s tremendous. I mean, one

00:03:57.939 –> 00:04:00.900
of the more fundamental things is the amount

00:04:00.900 –> 00:04:04.539
of sleep loss that there is. And, you know, any

00:04:04.539 –> 00:04:07.740
of us who have a bad night’s sleep don’t need

00:04:07.740 –> 00:04:09.979
to be told the psychological impacts the next

00:04:09.979 –> 00:04:12.439
day because our co-workers are probably telling

00:04:12.439 –> 00:04:16.319
us. It is just incredibly impactful. And for

00:04:16.319 –> 00:04:19.500
kids – I’m a pediatric dermatologist, so I will

00:04:19.500 –> 00:04:22.439
speak specifically of the pediatric population,

00:04:22.540 –> 00:04:25.779
but this is true for adults with poor performance

00:04:25.779 –> 00:04:28.360
or impaired performance at work – but for kids,

00:04:28.399 –> 00:04:32.939
their concentration is affected, their ability

00:04:32.939 –> 00:04:35.980
to focus at school. Oftentimes, there’s a question

00:04:35.980 –> 00:04:38.779
of whether or not one of the comorbidities associated

00:04:38.779 –> 00:04:41.740
with atopic dermatitis is attention deficit hyperactivity

00:04:41.740 –> 00:04:44.660
disorder. That can be challenging, right? Because

00:04:44.660 –> 00:04:47.160
they’re losing so much sleep, they’re tired and

00:04:47.160 –> 00:04:49.339
they’re inattentive. And so that can be sort

00:04:49.339 –> 00:04:52.800
of a challenging thing to untangle. And I think

00:04:52.800 –> 00:04:54.930
what’s Really interesting as you probe deeper

00:04:54.930 –> 00:04:58.449
into this. It’s not just the child or the adult

00:04:58.449 –> 00:05:02.029
patient It’s the child affected by eczema and

00:05:02.029 –> 00:05:04.810
then the parents who are also not getting a good

00:05:04.810 –> 00:05:07.610
night’s sleep either because the child’s in the

00:05:07.610 –> 00:05:10.480
other room keeping them up knocking on the door,

00:05:10.540 –> 00:05:12.980
asking for help, asking for something to relieve

00:05:12.980 –> 00:05:15.939
that itch, or we know the adults will sometimes

00:05:15.939 –> 00:05:18.819
bring the child patient into the bed with them.

00:05:18.959 –> 00:05:21.180
Now you have three people potentially, or more

00:05:21.180 –> 00:05:24.860
than that, kicking, disturbing their sleep. Now

00:05:24.860 –> 00:05:27.439
their work performance is suffering. That can

00:05:27.439 –> 00:05:29.860
affect their employment. That can affect a promotion

00:05:29.860 –> 00:05:32.839
that was competitive until, geez, “The last couple

00:05:32.839 –> 00:05:35.360
of weeks, you look like you haven’t slept, John.

00:05:35.540 –> 00:05:37.399
I think we’re going to go with Mary on this one!”.

00:05:38.920 –> 00:05:42.019
I think it kind of snowballs from that perspective.

00:05:42.300 –> 00:05:45.800
Marital relations have been affected by other

00:05:45.800 –> 00:05:48.319
children’s suffering from this condition. So

00:05:48.319 –> 00:05:50.480
to me, it’s always interesting, not just the

00:05:50.480 –> 00:05:52.939
patient, other kids too, even unaffected kids

00:05:52.939 –> 00:05:55.220
within a family. They can’t do some of the things

00:05:55.220 –> 00:05:58.029
that they want to do. And it gets lost. That’s

00:05:58.029 –> 00:05:59.970
not captured as far as I’m concerned when you’re

00:05:59.970 –> 00:06:02.649
trying to make the case for a particular medication

00:06:02.649 –> 00:06:05.389
to the insurance company or the prior authorization

00:06:05.389 –> 00:06:08.930
team. You can’t really objectively quantify that

00:06:08.930 –> 00:06:12.910
easily. And it’s unfortunate. Makes our job harder.

00:06:13.709 –> 00:06:17.189
100%. Atopic dermatitis eczema is a family disorder.

00:06:17.660 –> 00:06:20.500
It is not just the individual who suffers from

00:06:20.500 –> 00:06:22.939
it. Oftentimes, because it tends to run in families,

00:06:22.959 –> 00:06:25.920
it can be literally more than one patient who

00:06:25.920 –> 00:06:28.000
was affected by it. But even if there’s only

00:06:28.000 –> 00:06:30.360
one, for all the reasons you say, if you want

00:06:30.360 –> 00:06:33.339
to look at the data, a kid with moderate to severe

00:06:33.339 –> 00:06:36.860
eczema loses 2 .1 hours of sleep a night. The

00:06:36.860 –> 00:06:40.620
family, the parent, 1 .8. So they’re all losing

00:06:40.620 –> 00:06:43.480
sleep, and that plays out throughout their life.

00:06:43.699 –> 00:06:48.060
We refer to comorbidities with ADHD. Well, one

00:06:48.060 –> 00:06:50.420
of our recent guidelines that we’ve published

00:06:50.420 –> 00:06:52.959
with the American Academy of Dermatology with

00:06:52.959 –> 00:06:56.860
regard to adult comorbidities, depression, anxiety,

00:06:57.300 –> 00:06:59.920
these things are more common in patients with

00:06:59.920 –> 00:07:02.500
moderate to severe disease. So I 100 % agree

00:07:02.500 –> 00:07:05.100
with what you’ve said. From a physical perspective,

00:07:05.339 –> 00:07:08.959
what are some of the specific clues or clinical

00:07:08.959 –> 00:07:10.899
signs that you’re dealing with someone with now

00:07:10.899 –> 00:07:13.500
severe atopic dermatitis rather than mild or

00:07:13.500 –> 00:07:16.490
moderate? Are there any? Yeah, for sure. So if

00:07:16.490 –> 00:07:19.589
we were doing a clinical trial, the sort of metrics

00:07:19.589 –> 00:07:22.889
in the EASI score, which is one of the eczema area

00:07:22.889 –> 00:07:25.189
and severity index, one of the things that we

00:07:25.189 –> 00:07:28.290
try to capture, the clinical signs are erythema,

00:07:28.430 –> 00:07:32.389
redness, papulation, bumpiness, excorations,

00:07:32.470 –> 00:07:34.850
scratch marks, and lichenification. That idea

00:07:34.850 –> 00:07:37.410
that the skin just looks like a hyperlinear,

00:07:37.490 –> 00:07:40.149
extra lines in the skin because it’s literally

00:07:40.149 –> 00:07:42.930
thickened almost like a callus in shoes that

00:07:42.930 –> 00:07:45.019
you wear that are too tight. And so those are

00:07:45.019 –> 00:07:47.319
the sort of signs that we look for. And then

00:07:47.319 –> 00:07:49.699
again, as we alluded a little bit earlier, that

00:07:49.699 –> 00:07:53.199
surface area, that quantity, that extent of involvement,

00:07:53.319 –> 00:07:55.199
we try to capture as well to put it all into

00:07:55.199 –> 00:07:58.660
a score. But all of these things sort of factor

00:07:58.660 –> 00:08:00.779
in. And you made a great point earlier where

00:08:00.779 –> 00:08:05.360
even some of the clinical metrics that we’re

00:08:05.360 –> 00:08:08.000
using don’t capture the extent of it. The EASI

00:08:08.000 –> 00:08:11.300
score, the most commonly used metric, does not

00:08:11.300 –> 00:08:16.860
include subjectives. It doesn’t include anything

00:08:16.860 –> 00:08:18.920
to do with what the patient’s actually feeling.

00:08:18.980 –> 00:08:21.420
So another one more commonly used in Europe,

00:08:21.420 –> 00:08:24.360
but oftentimes used in studies done here too,

00:08:24.459 –> 00:08:26.959
called a SCORAD, at least includes sleep loss

00:08:26.959 –> 00:08:31.079
and itch. So there is that. But all of these

00:08:31.079 –> 00:08:33.240
things factor into this sort of assessment that

00:08:33.240 –> 00:08:37.169
we make. How do you approach either… colonization

00:08:37.169 –> 00:08:40.490
or superinfection by a bacteria or in some cases

00:08:40.490 –> 00:08:43.450
a virus like eczema herpeticum it does that exist

00:08:43.450 –> 00:08:45.789
in your sort of clinical assessment as a standalone

00:08:45.789 –> 00:08:50.409
criteria or quality or do you use the presence

00:08:50.409 –> 00:08:54.309
of active infection to kick up the severity level

00:08:54.309 –> 00:08:58.450
or and or do you use the history of recurrent

00:08:58.450 –> 00:09:00.769
infections to change your severity level even

00:09:00.769 –> 00:09:03.210
though the kid might be mild in your in your

00:09:03.210 –> 00:09:06.679
exam room today, does that change the fact that

00:09:06.679 –> 00:09:09.759
you would consider repeated infections as making

00:09:09.759 –> 00:09:13.019
it more severe or less? Yeah, I do. I mean, those

00:09:13.019 –> 00:09:16.240
are really significant things that require significant

00:09:16.240 –> 00:09:18.720
interventions, whether it’s in the mildest end

00:09:18.720 –> 00:09:22.200
of the Staphylococcal bacterial infection spectrum

00:09:22.200 –> 00:09:27.139
using a topical antibiotic versus something like

00:09:27.139 –> 00:09:30.019
eczema herpeticum, which is a term we use to

00:09:30.019 –> 00:09:33.080
suggest that a child with eczema has a Herpes

00:09:33.080 –> 00:09:35.620
infection, which, you know, just to paint a picture,

00:09:35.779 –> 00:09:38.519
typically if we think about HSV-1, herpes simplex

00:09:38.519 –> 00:09:42.139
virus 1, a cold sore, quote unquote. right? Very

00:09:42.139 –> 00:09:45.200
common. You know, you get a recurrent spot on

00:09:45.200 –> 00:09:47.700
the lip. No one likes it. It is unpleasant for

00:09:47.700 –> 00:09:50.379
everyone, but oftentimes people just let it go

00:09:50.379 –> 00:09:52.759
and be untreated and it heals itself and may

00:09:52.759 –> 00:09:55.200
recur in that same spot, but not as impactful

00:09:55.200 –> 00:09:57.799
as it potentially could be. In a patient with

00:09:57.799 –> 00:10:01.039
eczema, for reasons we now know, there’s sort

00:10:01.039 –> 00:10:03.480
of an ability to fight off infections in their

00:10:03.480 –> 00:10:06.299
skin. Systemically, most kids with eczema, their

00:10:06.299 –> 00:10:10.179
immune systems are very healthy and robust, but

00:10:10.519 –> 00:10:13.960
In their skin, they have typically fewer what

00:10:13.960 –> 00:10:16.639
we call antimicrobial peptides, almost like nature’s

00:10:16.639 –> 00:10:19.740
mupirocin, something just sitting on the skin,

00:10:19.860 –> 00:10:22.379
helping us fight off infection. There’s less

00:10:22.379 –> 00:10:24.600
of it. They’re called beta-defensins or cathelicidins.

00:10:24.679 –> 00:10:27.200
There’s less of it in patients with atopic dermatitis.

00:10:27.360 –> 00:10:30.759
So they’re not as easily able to fight off bacterial

00:10:30.759 –> 00:10:33.639
infections, viral infections, and just sort of

00:10:33.639 –> 00:10:36.480
an interesting corollary. I always teach my residents,

00:10:36.740 –> 00:10:39.039
you know, they see patients with eczema and Staph

00:10:39.039 –> 00:10:41.240
superinfection. in the emergency department all

00:10:41.240 –> 00:10:43.990
the time because it’s so common. Almost never

00:10:43.990 –> 00:10:46.509
do they see a patient with psoriasis, another

00:10:46.509 –> 00:10:50.330
chronic T-cell-mediated immune rash of the

00:10:50.330 –> 00:10:53.250
skin. Almost never do you see them in the emergency

00:10:53.250 –> 00:10:55.309
room with a Staphylococcal superinfection. And

00:10:55.309 –> 00:10:57.590
that’s because their beta-defensins, their cathelicidins,

00:10:57.629 –> 00:11:02.529
their nature’s mupirocin or antibiotic is normal

00:11:02.529 –> 00:11:05.789
or upregulated, where in eczema, it’s less. And

00:11:05.789 –> 00:11:08.750
so there’s a very ready explanation for that.

00:11:08.830 –> 00:11:11.669
But 100%, if I see a kid who’s getting recurrent

00:11:11.669 –> 00:11:14.509
infection, even if – maybe by other metrics, they’re

00:11:14.509 –> 00:11:17.110
more mild – we’re going to think about maybe not

00:11:17.110 –> 00:11:18.909
only in our own mind and trying to make that

00:11:18.909 –> 00:11:20.529
patient better, which is really what we’re trying

00:11:20.529 –> 00:11:23.429
to do, but trying to document and justify if

00:11:23.429 –> 00:11:25.529
we feel they need more aggressive medications,

00:11:25.710 –> 00:11:28.049
which we’ll talk about the medication things

00:11:28.049 –> 00:11:30.789
a little bit later, I think. We’re going to need

00:11:30.789 –> 00:11:33.250
to document that and say, hey, look, this is

00:11:33.250 –> 00:11:35.409
their easy score, but hey, they’ve had two Staph

00:11:35.409 –> 00:11:37.309
infections. They’ve had an eczema herpeticum.

00:11:37.389 –> 00:11:39.830
This is something we need to address, and we

00:11:39.830 –> 00:11:41.990
may need more aggressive medicines to do it.

00:11:42.250 –> 00:11:46.450
How do you use the medicines or I should say

00:11:46.450 –> 00:11:48.049
maybe interventions, because that’s a little

00:11:48.049 –> 00:11:50.629
bit more general, that the patient has tried

00:11:50.629 –> 00:11:54.830
in the past as a way to either change or upgrade

00:11:54.830 –> 00:11:57.429
their severity? Does that make sense? Do you

00:11:57.429 –> 00:12:02.330
get what I’m asking? Yeah, for sure. And it’s

00:12:02.330 –> 00:12:05.289
an important discussion because I guess by definition,

00:12:05.289 –> 00:12:07.909
if we’re talking about this particular type of

00:12:07.909 –> 00:12:11.700
patient, something’s not going well. Either their

00:12:11.700 –> 00:12:16.279
eczema is not responding as we had hoped or they’re

00:12:16.279 –> 00:12:19.360
getting superinfections. Either of those things

00:12:19.360 –> 00:12:22.240
are not good and we need to figure out why. And

00:12:22.240 –> 00:12:25.320
so if, let’s take an example of, to answer your

00:12:25.320 –> 00:12:27.679
specific question, this is a patient who’s used

00:12:27.679 –> 00:12:31.679
2 .5 % hydrocortisone and they come in to see

00:12:31.679 –> 00:12:33.720
you and they say, I’m not getting better. Or

00:12:33.720 –> 00:12:35.240
you can see they’re not getting better. They’ve

00:12:35.240 –> 00:12:37.240
had infections. Well, the first thing you want

00:12:37.240 –> 00:12:39.440
to make sure is, are they actually using it?

00:12:40.019 –> 00:12:44.500
Because that’s a huge issue. I mean, none of

00:12:44.500 –> 00:12:48.460
us are perfect with medicine adherence. Not a

00:12:48.460 –> 00:12:51.679
single person. Not present company included.

00:12:51.840 –> 00:12:53.940
Not anyone probably listening to this podcast.

00:12:55.019 –> 00:12:58.460
But it’s even harder for a patient who has to

00:12:58.460 –> 00:13:02.200
do something. daily, topical, not very pleasant

00:13:02.200 –> 00:13:05.039
for many folks to adhere. So there’s literally

00:13:05.039 –> 00:13:08.799
the challenges of adhering. And then there’s

00:13:08.799 –> 00:13:11.139
the fear, potentially, of some of the medications

00:13:11.139 –> 00:13:14.120
we prescribe. And if we don’t address those fears

00:13:14.120 –> 00:13:18.960
and bring them out and give proper space for

00:13:18.960 –> 00:13:22.019
the parents to explain their fears and then address

00:13:22.019 –> 00:13:25.059
them, maybe or maybe not reassure them. But if

00:13:25.059 –> 00:13:26.940
you don’t reassure them, you would know that

00:13:26.940 –> 00:13:29.230
that’s a problem so you can move on. on to a

00:13:29.230 –> 00:13:32.070
different medication. But those are the sorts

00:13:32.070 –> 00:13:34.409
of things I think, Andrew, to answer your question,

00:13:34.470 –> 00:13:38.470
that I try to think about when I see a patient

00:13:38.470 –> 00:13:41.809
in that context. Do you have any tips or tricks

00:13:41.809 –> 00:13:43.590
for how you assess if the patient’s actually

00:13:43.590 –> 00:13:46.629
using the medicines that you give them? Well,

00:13:46.690 –> 00:13:50.679
first of all, I will… Ask them. I mean, in

00:13:50.679 –> 00:13:53.000
a study, in a clinical trial, we’ll weigh tubes,

00:13:53.240 –> 00:13:56.360
right? So we will actually weigh the tubes, have

00:13:56.360 –> 00:14:00.980
them bring them back, weigh them, and see. In

00:14:00.980 –> 00:14:05.799
a regular clinic visit, it really is my biggest…

00:14:06.860 –> 00:14:10.799
tip or trick with regard, let’s just talk specifically

00:14:10.799 –> 00:14:12.960
about topical steroids now. We may be getting

00:14:12.960 –> 00:14:16.919
ahead of ourselves, but my biggest tip there

00:14:16.919 –> 00:14:20.360
is, number one, to not be dismissive of those

00:14:20.360 –> 00:14:25.070
concerns. Hopefully, before I ever prescribe

00:14:25.070 –> 00:14:27.509
them, I’ve gone through, number one, this is

00:14:27.509 –> 00:14:30.870
a topical steroid that have been around for 75 years.

00:14:31.090 –> 00:14:33.029
We’ve got a ton of experience with them. They

00:14:33.029 –> 00:14:36.009
are not the steroids that you see banned from

00:14:36.009 –> 00:14:38.090
professional sports leagues. This is a very,

00:14:38.129 –> 00:14:43.059
very different thing. So I start there. And then

00:14:43.059 –> 00:14:45.179
I’ll go, okay, what are we worried about? And

00:14:45.179 –> 00:14:47.100
depending on the age of the child, if it’s a

00:14:47.100 –> 00:14:50.000
two-month-old preemie, I may very much be worried

00:14:50.000 –> 00:14:52.240
about the absorption and what’s going inside

00:14:52.240 –> 00:14:54.759
of the topical steroid. So we’ll talk about that

00:14:54.759 –> 00:14:57.990
and how we mitigate that risk. More often, it’s

00:14:57.990 –> 00:15:02.370
an older child with maybe focal atopic dermatitis

00:15:02.370 –> 00:15:05.830
patches and plaques and itchy areas. And I’ll

00:15:05.830 –> 00:15:09.009
say, listen, this two-year, four- or five-year

00:15:09.009 –> 00:15:11.110
-old child, you know, one of their hands, not

00:15:11.110 –> 00:15:13.429
my hand, one of THEIR hands is 1% of THEIR body

00:15:13.429 –> 00:15:15.549
surface area. Let’s say they have it on both

00:15:15.549 –> 00:15:19.049
elbows, both knees. That’s what? Barely 2%, 3

00:15:19.049 –> 00:15:21.149
% of their body surface area. They are not going

00:15:21.149 –> 00:15:23.950
to absorb enough to matter inside. So let’s not

00:15:23.950 –> 00:15:26.759
worry about that. But then there like, what about

00:15:26.759 –> 00:15:29.720
thinning of the skin? They’ve always heard, oh

00:15:29.720 –> 00:15:31.639
God, topical steroids can thin the skin and they

00:15:31.639 –> 00:15:34.639
can. But if that’s where you leave it, they’ve

00:15:34.639 –> 00:15:37.159
read that online. They’ve heard that from their

00:15:37.159 –> 00:15:38.779
topical, from their topical steroid. They’ve

00:15:38.779 –> 00:15:41.919
heard that from their pediatrician. If that’s

00:15:41.919 –> 00:15:44.549
where you leave it. You know, what is that? Is

00:15:44.549 –> 00:15:48.289
that bad? Does it go away? So what I try to do

00:15:48.289 –> 00:15:50.610
with that is I will take them through what it

00:15:50.610 –> 00:15:53.009
is and say, first of all, for the reasons we’re

00:15:53.009 –> 00:15:54.470
talking about it, we’re going to use the right

00:15:54.470 –> 00:15:56.649
strength in the right areas for the right amount

00:15:56.649 –> 00:15:59.129
of time. So what we’re about to describe is never

00:15:59.129 –> 00:16:02.509
going to happen. But just in case, here’s what

00:16:02.509 –> 00:16:04.620
it would look like. And oftentimes on a little

00:16:04.620 –> 00:16:07.059
baby, because that’s where fears are most acute

00:16:07.059 –> 00:16:09.740
for parents, especially providers too. I’ll point

00:16:09.740 –> 00:16:12.659
to the temple because the temple is an area where

00:16:12.659 –> 00:16:14.639
it rarely gets eczema. So they haven’t used any

00:16:14.639 –> 00:16:17.259
topical steroids there. And every baby, the skin

00:16:17.259 –> 00:16:19.620
is just very tight. And so you can see a little

00:16:19.620 –> 00:16:22.500
vein traversing that area, which is a little

00:16:22.500 –> 00:16:24.460
more subtle than if you look through your wrist

00:16:24.460 –> 00:16:26.340
or my wrist or other areas where you can always

00:16:26.340 –> 00:16:28.460
see veins. And I’ll say, so if you see something

00:16:28.460 –> 00:16:32.830
like that here. Or here, pointing to my cheek

00:16:32.830 –> 00:16:35.870
or my elbow, places where you hadn’t seen that

00:16:35.870 –> 00:16:39.169
vein before. Perhaps that’s the first sign of

00:16:39.169 –> 00:16:40.750
thinning of the skin. Well, guess what? It’s

00:16:40.750 –> 00:16:44.389
entirely reversible. So I kind of take them through

00:16:44.389 –> 00:16:47.509
that so they know that there’s not this condition

00:16:47.509 –> 00:16:50.429
that they hope and expect and have been told

00:16:50.429 –> 00:16:53.090
will get better with time. And then they create

00:16:53.090 –> 00:16:56.399
a problem that won’t. So I try to let them know,

00:16:56.440 –> 00:16:59.480
kind of empower them to be able to see what that

00:16:59.480 –> 00:17:02.240
thing they’re so worried about is at a time when

00:17:02.240 –> 00:17:05.400
we can all recover from it. I totally agree.

00:17:05.519 –> 00:17:08.160
I do everything that you just said. And then

00:17:08.160 –> 00:17:11.579
if I’m lucky, quote unquote, the patient has

00:17:11.579 –> 00:17:13.539
some lichenification, some thickening of the

00:17:13.539 –> 00:17:16.920
skin. This is exactly what we’re trying to treat.

00:17:17.299 –> 00:17:20.259
So in a way, one of the potential side effects

00:17:20.259 –> 00:17:23.900
is going to actually be used. for good, and we’re

00:17:23.900 –> 00:17:26.240
going to thin that skin back to normal, we’re

00:17:26.240 –> 00:17:28.799
not going to go past normal, right? And then

00:17:28.799 –> 00:17:31.539
I always talk about how it’s different around

00:17:31.539 –> 00:17:34.099
or on the eyelids, around the eyes, on the eyelids,

00:17:34.180 –> 00:17:36.640
that can cause other problems separate from thinning

00:17:36.640 –> 00:17:39.640
of the skin. Your child doesn’t have any need

00:17:39.640 –> 00:17:41.940
to put a topical steroid anywhere near their

00:17:41.940 –> 00:17:46.259
eyes, you know, so don’t, right? What I’ve found

00:17:46.259 –> 00:17:50.319
probably two things that have really kind of

00:17:50.319 –> 00:17:53.710
changed the way I talk with my patients in the

00:17:53.710 –> 00:17:55.950
exam room one actually I have to give credit

00:17:55.950 –> 00:17:59.230
where credit’s due my former colleague, mentor

00:17:59.230 –> 00:18:03.690
Larry Eichenfield, MD used to make them bring their

00:18:03.690 –> 00:18:07.750
tubes in physically and it might be a 30-gram

00:18:07.750 –> 00:18:09.990
tube it might be a 15-gram tube – geez you would

00:18:09.990 –> 00:18:12.490
hope not – but usually it’s a 30- or 60-gram tube

00:18:12.490 –> 00:18:15.210
and he would say okay first off to your point

00:18:15.690 –> 00:18:17.329
“How come this hasn’t been opened yet, right?”

00:18:18.109 –> 00:18:20.630
Well, I just got it refilled. That’s a lot different

00:18:20.630 –> 00:18:23.490
than you’ve had this for three months and you’re

00:18:23.490 –> 00:18:25.349
telling me nothing’s working. This is the first

00:18:25.349 –> 00:18:28.750
tube. You haven’t refilled it once and the seal’s

00:18:28.750 –> 00:18:31.069
not even broken on it, right? So that reframes

00:18:31.069 –> 00:18:33.710
the conversation. But more often than not, it’s

00:18:33.710 –> 00:18:37.109
open and something’s been removed from it. But

00:18:37.109 –> 00:18:41.410
you can say, okay, I expect you to use this medicine.

00:18:42.280 –> 00:18:44.359
once or twice a day. Are you a, are you a two

00:18:44.359 –> 00:18:46.759
times a day guy or one time a day guy? Generally

00:18:46.759 –> 00:18:49.380
twice a day twice at it. Me too. So, twice a day

00:18:49.380 –> 00:18:52.000
and in general depending of course what strength

00:18:52.000 –> 00:18:53.880
I’m using like I don’t really want you to use

00:18:53.880 –> 00:18:56.720
it more than two weeks without at least letting

00:18:56.720 –> 00:18:58.559
me know if something something’s probably not

00:18:58.559 –> 00:19:00.420
right if you have to keep using this medicine

00:19:00.420 –> 00:19:02.680
more than two weeks and you’re not getting any

00:19:02.680 –> 00:19:05.200
effect and I’ll couch that and say, you know

00:19:05.200 –> 00:19:07.059
if it’s if it’s almost clear and you’re hitting

00:19:07.059 –> 00:19:10.819
day 14 go ahead and use it until until 15 or

00:19:10.819 –> 00:19:14.400
16 and you’re fine. But how much of this medicine

00:19:14.400 –> 00:19:16.599
do you think, using this tube as your example,

00:19:16.680 –> 00:19:18.819
how much of the medicine do you expect to go

00:19:18.819 –> 00:19:22.240
through in those two weeks? And I’ve found that

00:19:22.240 –> 00:19:25.440
I’m 100% shocked that they might say, oh, a

00:19:25.440 –> 00:19:28.579
quarter of the tube, of a 30-gram tube. Well,

00:19:28.599 –> 00:19:33.119
no, your child’s 12 years old. 60 kilograms.

00:19:33.319 –> 00:19:35.200
You’re going to be going through two 30-gram

00:19:35.200 –> 00:19:38.640
tubes pretty easily. And oh, wow, I’d never really

00:19:38.640 –> 00:19:40.940
thought of it that way. So physically telling

00:19:40.940 –> 00:19:44.299
them, I want you to go through this tube in one

00:19:44.299 –> 00:19:46.160
week, of course, depending on the size of the

00:19:46.160 –> 00:19:48.660
tube again, but that’s the amount of medicine

00:19:48.660 –> 00:19:51.579
I expect you to be using on a weekly basis, I’ve

00:19:51.579 –> 00:19:54.420
found to be very powerful. And then I also, I’ve

00:19:54.420 –> 00:19:56.480
learned from the way I’ve written prescriptions,

00:19:56.539 –> 00:19:59.299
I’ve always tried to write using no abbreviations.

00:19:59.359 –> 00:20:02.640
I hate abbreviations. And I think it’s just confusing

00:20:02.640 –> 00:20:07.640
to say A -A -A -B -I -D -X -2 -W -K -S. Apply

00:20:07.640 –> 00:20:10.099
to affected area twice a day for two weeks. That

00:20:10.099 –> 00:20:12.440
doesn’t mean anything to anybody except the pharmacist.

00:20:13.200 –> 00:20:16.059
So I’ll write out pretty detailed instructions,

00:20:16.279 –> 00:20:19.180
including I want you to take a week off between

00:20:19.180 –> 00:20:22.500
using. And what I’ve learned is that’s the message

00:20:22.500 –> 00:20:25.539
was lost. If you’re using it on your LEFT elbow

00:20:25.539 –> 00:20:29.319
crease, for example, in my mind, it’s still quite

00:20:29.529 –> 00:20:31.869
reasonable to use it on your RIGHT elbow crease

00:20:31.869 –> 00:20:35.490
if a new rash flare pops out or behind your knee

00:20:35.490 –> 00:20:37.390
or wherever you might use it but I’ve learned

00:20:37.390 –> 00:20:39.329
from my patients that they said, “Oh, well you told

00:20:39.329 –> 00:20:42.150
me not to use the medicine for that week” and

00:20:42.150 –> 00:20:45.150
then they’ll just let any new flare go untreated

00:20:45.150 –> 00:20:47.509
for seven days and I missed that opportunity.

00:20:47.509 –> 00:20:50.230
That’s on me. That’s just poor instruction. Have

00:20:50.230 –> 00:20:52.750
you ever had anything like that pop up with your

00:20:52.750 –> 00:20:57.259
patients? Oh, for sure. And it’s just remarkable

00:20:57.259 –> 00:21:00.099
how many times they’ll come into a new visit,

00:21:00.240 –> 00:21:04.819
and they’ll say, “Okay, this triamcinolone, for

00:21:04.819 –> 00:21:08.579
instance, works really well, but I was told I

00:21:08.579 –> 00:21:10.559
could only use it for 15 days out of the month.”

00:21:10.880 –> 00:21:13.279
And eczema is not a “15 days out of the month”

00:21:13.279 –> 00:21:15.660
proposition. And so you have to figure out how

00:21:15.660 –> 00:21:19.799
to… I will always say, I will never say, “Oh,

00:21:19.819 –> 00:21:21.839
that silly pediatrician, They don’t know what

00:21:21.839 –> 00:21:24.720
they’re talking about.” I’ll say I 100 % agree

00:21:24.720 –> 00:21:26.559
with that. What they’re trying to communicate

00:21:26.559 –> 00:21:30.440
there is that you need to take breaks. But let’s

00:21:30.440 –> 00:21:33.839
just delve into that a little further. Exactly

00:21:33.839 –> 00:21:35.740
what you said in terms of different locations

00:21:35.740 –> 00:21:40.160
is one element of it. Knowing also that there

00:21:40.160 –> 00:21:42.059
are going to be times where they need to use

00:21:42.059 –> 00:21:45.900
it a little longer. Their child catches a cold,

00:21:46.000 –> 00:21:48.940
runny nose, whatever, seemingly having nothing

00:21:48.940 –> 00:21:51.160
to do with the skin. Well, it’s immune stimulation,

00:21:51.359 –> 00:21:53.440
right? Your immune system is going to rev up

00:21:53.440 –> 00:21:57.259
to get that virus gone, and that stimulates the

00:21:57.259 –> 00:21:59.019
eczema. And so they may have an eczema flare

00:21:59.019 –> 00:22:01.460
in the wake of a cold that makes them have to

00:22:01.460 –> 00:22:03.470
have this burst of… treatment for a little

00:22:03.470 –> 00:22:07.470
bit longer to kind of calm things down so all

00:22:07.470 –> 00:22:10.130
of those things I 100 % agree with especially

00:22:10.130 –> 00:22:15.720
the idea of oftentimes how far a medicine will

00:22:15.720 –> 00:22:18.200
be able to go and how much they should use. Sometimes

00:22:18.200 –> 00:22:20.099
see them come in with these tiny, not even 15

00:22:20.099 –> 00:22:22.640
grams, these tiny little sample sizes, and that’s

00:22:22.640 –> 00:22:24.740
all they were given. And boy, it worked well

00:22:24.740 –> 00:22:27.059
on that one square centimeter of my skin, but

00:22:27.059 –> 00:22:29.599
probably not going to make a huge difference.

00:22:29.839 –> 00:22:32.279
And then the last thing I’ll say is, as you well

00:22:32.279 –> 00:22:35.440
know, frequently eczema, when it gets better,

00:22:35.680 –> 00:22:38.720
heals with some dispigmentation, some discoloration,

00:22:38.920 –> 00:22:40.799
sometimes a little lighter, sometimes a little

00:22:40.799 –> 00:22:43.319
darker. And I think there are two really important

00:22:43.319 –> 00:22:47.180
messages there involved with that is number one,

00:22:47.339 –> 00:22:50.519
if you, and many parents do, will sort of carefully

00:22:50.519 –> 00:22:53.400
parse the adverse effects of topical steroids,

00:22:53.559 –> 00:22:55.779
one of which can say can cause discoloration

00:22:55.779 –> 00:22:59.579
and hypopigmentation, and it can, but it’s also

00:22:59.579 –> 00:23:01.720
really important to remember and much more common

00:23:01.720 –> 00:23:04.960
that the skin, the eczema is healing and it’s

00:23:04.960 –> 00:23:08.200
that inflammation itself that the eczema, that’s

00:23:08.200 –> 00:23:11.569
what eczema is, that is causing that. temporary

00:23:11.569 –> 00:23:14.430
not permanent discoloration and so i always want

00:23:14.430 –> 00:23:15.990
to make sure that they realize that that’s not

00:23:15.990 –> 00:23:19.890
a side effect of of the the topical steroid and

00:23:19.890 –> 00:23:22.670
then further on the other side of things is is

00:23:22.670 –> 00:23:25.509
getting at not using too much with regard to

00:23:25.509 –> 00:23:28.789
this discoloration is unless you tell parents

00:23:28.789 –> 00:23:32.069
it doesn’t look normal right that examine heals

00:23:32.069 –> 00:23:35.940
and it looks abnormal. It’s discolored. And yet

00:23:35.940 –> 00:23:39.799
it’s not inflamed anymore. It’s flat. It’s smooth.

00:23:40.000 –> 00:23:43.099
It’s not itchy. It’s not red. And so what I’ll

00:23:43.099 –> 00:23:46.480
tell parents is, is if it’s not bumpy, it’s not

00:23:46.480 –> 00:23:50.640
red, it’s not itchy, just moisturize it. That’s

00:23:50.640 –> 00:23:53.160
just your healed eczema. And if you keep treating

00:23:53.160 –> 00:23:55.779
with a topical steroid to that, yeah, you may,

00:23:55.900 –> 00:23:57.700
number one, you don’t need it. And number two,

00:23:57.759 –> 00:24:00.000
you are increasing the risk that you might actually

00:24:00.000 –> 00:24:03.599
cause a side effect. 100 % agree. I try to use

00:24:03.599 –> 00:24:06.940
proactively the hypopigmentation, usually is

00:24:06.940 –> 00:24:09.539
what I’m saying, as a sign you did your job.

00:24:09.700 –> 00:24:11.619
I mean, you knocked out the red, rough, itchy

00:24:11.619 –> 00:24:14.019
spots. If you can feel it, it’s still flaring,

00:24:14.019 –> 00:24:17.660
but a flat, paler skin is where that inflammation

00:24:17.660 –> 00:24:19.880
was. i don’t know if you have a spiel but i basically

00:24:19.880 –> 00:24:23.680
say the inflammation sort of “stuns” or “makes the

00:24:23.680 –> 00:24:27.079
cells that make your tan lazy” and they don’t,

00:24:27.079 –> 00:24:28.900
they’re not working like they should

00:24:28.900 –> 00:24:31.559
it takes i don’t know i tell usually about anywhere

00:24:31.559 –> 00:24:34.079
up to a year even a little longer sometimes for

00:24:34.079 –> 00:24:36.849
that to come back totally normal but the point

00:24:36.849 –> 00:24:40.089
is it should come back normally and you did what

00:24:40.089 –> 00:24:42.430
you needed to do to make sure that it’s now that

00:24:42.430 –> 00:24:45.130
timer has been started and you know you would

00:24:45.130 –> 00:24:47.890
expect the color going to be back hopefully by

00:24:47.890 –> 00:24:49.569
next summer and it’s going to get well that’s

00:24:49.569 –> 00:24:51.430
another good point it’s going to get worse you’re

00:24:51.430 –> 00:24:54.009
going to see this more in the summer months because

00:24:54.009 –> 00:24:56.150
the contrast around those spots is different

00:24:56.150 –> 00:24:57.970
and then the winter is going to be a little bit

00:24:57.970 –> 00:24:59.569
more blended in because you don’t get that tan.

00:24:59.569 –> 00:25:03.349
so yeah I totally agree, and I’ll leverage that

00:25:03.349 –> 00:25:06.849
further to sort of squeeze in yet another dermatologist

00:25:06.849 –> 00:25:09.369
message, which is if you go out in the summer,

00:25:09.470 –> 00:25:12.049
for the exact reasons you said, the quote -unquote

00:25:12.049 –> 00:25:15.549
normal skin tans normally, and the dispigmented,

00:25:15.589 –> 00:25:19.069
sort of hypopigmented skin doesn’t, and so the

00:25:19.069 –> 00:25:22.609
contrast makes it look worse. So therefore, sunscreen

00:25:22.609 –> 00:25:26.390
will actually help you minimize that apparent

00:25:26.390 –> 00:25:29.710
worsening in the summer with sun exposure. For

00:25:29.710 –> 00:25:32.809
that, for hypopigmentation related to post inflammation,

00:25:33.230 –> 00:25:36.390
I’m almost always saying I prescribe, quote unquote,

00:25:36.710 –> 00:25:39.390
you a combination moisturizer sunscreen. And

00:25:39.390 –> 00:25:42.349
there’s a couple out there. But you pick one

00:25:42.349 –> 00:25:44.490
of these three or four products is going to work.

00:25:44.549 –> 00:25:46.450
And that’s exactly what you need. It’s got sunscreen

00:25:46.450 –> 00:25:49.309
built in and it’s moisturizing your skin. Maybe

00:25:49.309 –> 00:25:51.650
I give them a little break from using something

00:25:51.650 –> 00:25:53.369
thick during the summer that I would normally

00:25:53.369 –> 00:25:55.549
have them being used in the winter. But that

00:25:55.549 –> 00:26:00.079
works great. In this day and age of TikTok, unfortunately,

00:26:00.119 –> 00:26:03.799
becoming some people’s main source for education,

00:26:04.059 –> 00:26:08.420
are you seeing the concept of topical steroid

00:26:08.420 –> 00:26:11.079
withdrawal percolate into your clinic yet? Is

00:26:11.079 –> 00:26:14.440
that a thing or have you managed to dodge that

00:26:14.440 –> 00:26:17.420
bullet? Well, I’ll say first of all, Andrew,

00:26:17.500 –> 00:26:20.559
I have to send a thank you note to you because

00:26:20.559 –> 00:26:26.440
I am a complete social media Luddite. And no

00:26:26.440 –> 00:26:29.779
Facebook, not even Doximity, none of that stuff.

00:26:29.880 –> 00:26:33.200
And my 18-year-old daughter is eternally embarrassed

00:26:33.200 –> 00:26:36.920
at my naivete around these things. And so when

00:26:36.920 –> 00:26:38.819
I told her I was doing a podcast with her, I

00:26:38.819 –> 00:26:42.279
got so much credit. A podcast with you. I got

00:26:42.279 –> 00:26:44.400
so much credit with her. So thank you for that.

00:26:45.660 –> 00:26:49.160
No problem. You are absolutely right. It is a

00:26:49.160 –> 00:26:55.549
source of information that is accessible. to

00:26:55.549 –> 00:26:57.769
families and patients. And it’s interesting and

00:26:57.769 –> 00:27:00.529
it’s engaging. And there is some good content

00:27:00.529 –> 00:27:02.789
in there. My daughter has shared some of that

00:27:02.789 –> 00:27:06.569
to sort of tell me it’s not all bad, but it’s

00:27:06.569 –> 00:27:12.569
also unregulated. And goodness knows, what could

00:27:12.569 –> 00:27:16.609
potentially be out there that’s potentially a

00:27:16.609 –> 00:27:21.569
challenge. And you mentioned one area of… controversy.

00:27:21.569 –> 00:27:24.430
The idea of topical steroid withdrawal, which

00:27:24.430 –> 00:27:27.250
I have no doubt is on TikTok. I haven’t seen

00:27:27.250 –> 00:27:30.710
those things, but I’m very aware of the problem.

00:27:30.910 –> 00:27:35.430
And yes, I have encountered it. I use the word

00:27:35.430 –> 00:27:37.750
controversial because there are folks who don’t

00:27:37.750 –> 00:27:41.329
think it exists. I’m not one of those folks,

00:27:41.369 –> 00:27:45.109
though I also am not sure I’ve ever seen it in

00:27:45.109 –> 00:27:48.579
a kid. I’ll say that. I 100 % agree. That’s actually

00:27:48.579 –> 00:27:51.039
really funny because that’s been my experience.

00:27:51.220 –> 00:27:54.279
I’ve seen it in adults. I distinctly remember

00:27:54.279 –> 00:27:58.579
a woman who had been treated for her facial rosacea.

00:27:59.140 –> 00:28:02.220
You wouldn’t believe this, I think, but beta

00:28:02.220 –> 00:28:05.160
methasone – ultra potent steroid – twice a day,

00:28:05.299 –> 00:28:08.720
every day for two years. On the face. On her

00:28:08.720 –> 00:28:12.990
face. She came in with… the largest blood vessels

00:28:12.990 –> 00:28:16.690
that you could see and she had stopped her steroid

00:28:16.690 –> 00:28:20.170
and now was on top of that background of blood

00:28:20.170 –> 00:28:23.289
vessels she had what looked like a demodex infection

00:28:23.289 –> 00:28:26.289
it didn’t turn out that it was but just hundreds

00:28:26.289 –> 00:28:29.849
of pustules all over her face and I thought well

00:28:29.849 –> 00:28:32.450
geez that’s probably what topical steroid withdrawal

00:28:32.450 –> 00:28:34.869
looks like but I’ve never seen it in a child

00:28:34.869 –> 00:28:37.400
and I don’t know if that’s because I don’t think

00:28:37.400 –> 00:28:39.539
it’s because kids are something special that

00:28:39.539 –> 00:28:42.039
they couldn’t get it. I just think we’re smarter

00:28:42.039 –> 00:28:44.960
about how we use the products. Is that fair or

00:28:44.960 –> 00:28:47.299
is that crazy? I think it is fair. And I think

00:28:47.299 –> 00:28:49.500
the other thing that sort of factors into that

00:28:49.500 –> 00:28:53.099
is non-dermatologists. And this could be a problem

00:28:53.099 –> 00:28:55.920
at the hands of a dermatologist, a non-dermatologist.

00:28:56.099 –> 00:28:59.400
But I think non-dermatologists are also much,

00:28:59.559 –> 00:29:04.019
much leerier. of using a very potent steroid

00:29:04.019 –> 00:29:06.980
in a child than they might be in an adult. And

00:29:06.980 –> 00:29:10.119
so I think that is the issue, is using extremely

00:29:10.119 –> 00:29:12.700
potent steroids, oftentimes on the face, the

00:29:12.700 –> 00:29:15.200
exact scenario you described, where I very much

00:29:15.200 –> 00:29:17.839
think it’s a real thing because I attend conferences

00:29:17.839 –> 00:29:21.980
and all sorts of things where I see these patients

00:29:21.980 –> 00:29:26.339
presented, they just aren’t my own. And it’s

00:29:26.339 –> 00:29:30.289
difficult because there are no diagnostic

00:29:30.289 –> 00:29:32.650
criteria. There are efforts being made to change

00:29:32.650 –> 00:29:37.430
that, but it’s a challenging scenario. And I’m

00:29:37.430 –> 00:29:41.910
sure that TikTok can, hopefully there are some

00:29:41.910 –> 00:29:44.410
sites on TikTok that maybe have some sensible

00:29:44.410 –> 00:29:46.549
ideas about it, but I’m sure it can also potentially

00:29:46.549 –> 00:29:49.750
fan the flames of controversy. Is it fair to

00:29:49.750 –> 00:29:53.279
say, though, if you used… hydrocortisone 2

00:29:53.279 –> 00:29:57.180
.5 % ointment or triamcinolone 0 .1 % ointment

00:29:57.180 –> 00:30:00.779
of medium strength. Even the one that I’ll use

00:30:00.779 –> 00:30:03.759
probably as my strongest quote -unquote go -to

00:30:03.759 –> 00:30:07.319
would be fluocinonide ointment. I’m very rarely

00:30:07.319 –> 00:30:10.059
using clobetasol. And if I do, it’s on the hands

00:30:10.059 –> 00:30:12.819
or feet or very thick area, very short limited

00:30:12.819 –> 00:30:15.200
amount of time. But those are kind of the three

00:30:15.200 –> 00:30:18.160
steroids that I’ll use on a stepwise approach.

00:30:19.220 –> 00:30:24.240
Any three… used twice a day for two weeks appropriately,

00:30:24.559 –> 00:30:27.960
would you ever expect to see the condition of

00:30:27.960 –> 00:30:30.859
“topical steroid withdrawal” associated with that

00:30:30.859 –> 00:30:33.079
clinical scenario? Does that exist in your mind

00:30:33.079 –> 00:30:35.859
as a possibility? Haven’t we been taught never

00:30:35.859 –> 00:30:37.380
to say “never” in medicine? Well, I’m going to

00:30:37.380 –> 00:30:40.819
say “never.” Okay. Yeah, I agree. That’s a NEVER.

00:30:42.209 –> 00:30:44.430
Unless, I don’t even think if you could eat it,

00:30:44.470 –> 00:30:47.690
I don’t think you could even get, maybe the Lidex,

00:30:47.690 –> 00:30:49.549
maybe the fluocinonide and you might be able to

00:30:49.549 –> 00:30:52.430
do some sort of adrenal suppression, but I, geez,

00:30:52.509 –> 00:30:54.369
I just don’t think it could. I don’t think it

00:30:54.369 –> 00:30:56.990
could do it. No, I agree with you. Well, one

00:30:56.990 –> 00:30:59.269
other aspect that I find always interesting from

00:30:59.269 –> 00:31:01.630
an investigative perspective is when you have

00:31:01.630 –> 00:31:04.390
a severe eczema patient and I’ll put eczema in

00:31:04.390 –> 00:31:06.730
quotes on this one and you’ve been treating them

00:31:06.730 –> 00:31:09.170
like they have atopic dermatitis and everything

00:31:09.170 –> 00:31:13.069
you’re doing is. has been tried, done correctly,

00:31:13.309 –> 00:31:17.089
not working, when do you take a step back and

00:31:17.089 –> 00:31:19.750
say, geez, could this be a hypersensitivity reaction?

00:31:19.990 –> 00:31:22.190
Could this be an allergic contact dermatitis?

00:31:22.789 –> 00:31:26.930
Are there clues? Yeah, and just an important

00:31:26.930 –> 00:31:29.089
thing to have in the back of your mind always.

00:31:29.720 –> 00:31:32.400
because it’s so easy for us to say, oh, must

00:31:32.400 –> 00:31:37.519
be non -adherence to the medicine, must be, there

00:31:37.519 –> 00:31:40.079
must be an allergen in the environment that we’re

00:31:40.079 –> 00:31:43.359
just missing, must be something, something. Well…

00:31:43.690 –> 00:31:46.069
Step back. Exactly what you said. Step back and

00:31:46.069 –> 00:31:47.890
make sure, okay, could this be something else?

00:31:49.390 –> 00:31:53.230
We actually, just as part of our American Academy

00:31:53.230 –> 00:31:55.630
of Dermatology Atopic Dermatitis Guidelines Committee

00:31:55.630 –> 00:31:57.750
have just, it’s not published yet, but it will

00:31:57.750 –> 00:32:02.130
be in the next few months, put out a guideline

00:32:02.130 –> 00:32:06.809
for adults with this exact scenario. What do

00:32:06.809 –> 00:32:09.730
you do? What do you think of when things aren’t

00:32:09.730 –> 00:32:12.839
going as they should? diagnostically so that’s

00:32:12.839 –> 00:32:15.279
specifically what where where do you go what

00:32:15.279 –> 00:32:18.579
do you think of and so um That absolutely is

00:32:18.579 –> 00:32:20.140
something you should think of because there are

00:32:20.140 –> 00:32:23.299
a number of things that can mimic atopic dermatitis.

00:32:23.420 –> 00:32:25.539
In the pediatric population, it can range from

00:32:25.539 –> 00:32:28.619
infestations like scabies to contact allergy,

00:32:28.799 –> 00:32:31.000
less common in kids and adults, but absolutely

00:32:31.000 –> 00:32:35.359
potentially a problem, to even some more severe

00:32:35.359 –> 00:32:38.880
or more significant conditions. So that is what

00:32:38.880 –> 00:32:42.289
I think of. You sort of go through, okay. Let’s

00:32:42.289 –> 00:32:44.509
step back. They’re diagnostic criteria. We don’t

00:32:44.509 –> 00:32:46.789
use them much, but they exist, and they’re wonderful

00:32:46.789 –> 00:32:49.549
to be able to fall back on. Is there a family

00:32:49.549 –> 00:32:51.630
history here? Does this itch? Is it in the proper

00:32:51.630 –> 00:32:54.069
distribution? Does it wax and wane? Then you

00:32:54.069 –> 00:32:57.170
can go through minor diagnostic criteria. Kind

00:32:57.170 –> 00:32:59.430
of go through all of those things in your mind,

00:32:59.490 –> 00:33:01.869
and then do appropriate tests if you need to.

00:33:02.029 –> 00:33:04.549
Scrape the skin looking for a fungal infection

00:33:04.549 –> 00:33:07.890
or for scabies. Biopsy if you need to. We don’t

00:33:07.890 –> 00:33:11.250
often, but it is potentially a viable way to

00:33:11.250 –> 00:33:13.720
get. more information. So all of those things

00:33:13.720 –> 00:33:15.779
need to be considered and potentially explored

00:33:15.779 –> 00:33:19.819
when that scenario presents. You reminded me

00:33:19.819 –> 00:33:22.720
when you were talking, I was a history major

00:33:22.720 –> 00:33:25.359
in school before I ever thought about going into

00:33:25.359 –> 00:33:28.200
medicine. And so I’m always fascinated when I

00:33:28.200 –> 00:33:31.380
learn, or at least what I think I’m learning

00:33:31.380 –> 00:33:34.220
about the historical perspective. Tell me if

00:33:34.220 –> 00:33:38.319
I’m wrong, the story behind Protopic. And topical

00:33:38.319 –> 00:33:39.960
calcineurin inhibitors, not necessarily just

00:33:39.960 –> 00:33:42.880
Protopic. When they first came out, there was

00:33:42.880 –> 00:33:48.180
no “black box” warning on them. The sort of the

00:33:48.180 –> 00:33:51.299
gates were up in terms of how you could use these

00:33:51.299 –> 00:33:54.460
medicines. And they weren’t steroids. They did

00:33:54.460 –> 00:33:56.740
not have the side effects or the purported side

00:33:56.740 –> 00:33:59.779
effects as steroids might have. So people, as

00:33:59.779 –> 00:34:02.200
I understood it, were using them willy-nilly

00:34:02.200 –> 00:34:05.400
might be a way to say it. Hey, that’s a red rash

00:34:05.400 –> 00:34:07.839
that’s raised. It looks like eczema. Put some

00:34:07.839 –> 00:34:10.639
topical calcineurin inhibitor on that rash and.

00:34:10.800 –> 00:34:14.039
I’ll see you back in six months. And this is

00:34:14.039 –> 00:34:16.360
the part where I’m asking rather than stating

00:34:16.360 –> 00:34:19.340
historical fact. What I’ve been told is that

00:34:19.340 –> 00:34:23.860
where that “black box” warning came was that some

00:34:23.860 –> 00:34:26.639
patients were not responding, ultimately wound

00:34:26.639 –> 00:34:30.300
up probably seeing a dermatologist, getting a

00:34:30.300 –> 00:34:34.360
biopsy, only to find out, hey, what we just biopsied

00:34:34.360 –> 00:34:37.480
was a skin cancer, a lymphoma. called mycosis

00:34:37.480 –> 00:34:39.340
fungoides, or something that looks like that.

00:34:39.719 –> 00:34:42.320
And then, of course, the big decision was, geez,

00:34:42.480 –> 00:34:46.280
did the medicine cause your eczema to turn into

00:34:46.280 –> 00:34:50.340
a lymphoma, or was the original diagnosis, always

00:34:50.340 –> 00:34:54.519
lymphoma, just misdiagnosed as eczema? Do I have

00:34:54.519 –> 00:34:58.760
the story pretty accurate? Yeah, you do. And

00:34:58.760 –> 00:35:00.079
I guess, first of all, now I have to send you

00:35:00.079 –> 00:35:01.599
a “thank you” note from my brother, who’s a history

00:35:01.599 –> 00:35:03.820
professor at Rice, so respect for that background.

00:35:05.119 –> 00:35:09.679
But 100%. So these were the first non-steroidals

00:35:09.679 –> 00:35:11.420
to come out that actually worked, right? I mean,

00:35:11.440 –> 00:35:20.619
back in 2000, 2001, tacrolimus (Protopic), Pimecrolimus

00:35:20.619 –> 00:35:23.900
(Elidel) – “Willy” and “Nilly,” if you will – were the

00:35:23.900 –> 00:35:27.590
ones that came out, and they worked. And they

00:35:27.590 –> 00:35:30.769
were never studied in the United States in kids

00:35:30.769 –> 00:35:33.110
under two years of age or never approved in kids

00:35:33.110 –> 00:35:36.789
under two years of age. And yet, when our parents

00:35:36.789 –> 00:35:39.869
and providers most worried about topical steroid

00:35:39.869 –> 00:35:42.489
safety. kids under two years of age and so they

00:35:42.489 –> 00:35:45.550
were used like water because they finally there’s

00:35:45.550 –> 00:35:48.469
a non -steroid that worked and here we go and

00:35:48.469 –> 00:35:54.610
um that was seen by the fda that this off-label

00:35:54.610 –> 00:35:58.250
use in infants was was was happening um as we

00:35:58.250 –> 00:36:01.150
alluded a little bit earlier a very young two

00:36:01.150 –> 00:36:03.730
-month -old preemie from head to toe eczema you

00:36:03.730 –> 00:36:06.070
put enough on their skin head to toe twice a

00:36:06.070 –> 00:36:08.170
day for a while it they are going to absorb enough

00:36:08.170 –> 00:36:10.949
to matter. And so they were worried that there

00:36:10.949 –> 00:36:15.510
were going to be potential risks that were not

00:36:15.510 –> 00:36:18.710
studied that came from that off -label use. And

00:36:18.710 –> 00:36:21.650
so five years later, the FDA looked at this and

00:36:21.650 –> 00:36:24.230
affixed that “black box” warning. And some of that

00:36:24.230 –> 00:36:26.570
had to do with the potential of biopsy having

00:36:26.570 –> 00:36:31.250
shown mycosis fungoides. But as you say, mycosis

00:36:31.250 –> 00:36:33.570
fungoides, that… publication that i alluded

00:36:33.570 –> 00:36:35.030
to a moment ago that’s coming out that’s one

00:36:35.030 –> 00:36:37.030
of the first things we say that can look like

00:36:37.030 –> 00:36:40.530
eczema is mycosis fungoides and so was it that

00:36:40.530 –> 00:36:44.690
was it eczema all along don’t know um that that

00:36:44.690 –> 00:36:47.630
was that was really the issue so i 100% agree

00:36:47.630 –> 00:36:50.230
with that and to take that one step further the

00:36:50.230 –> 00:36:52.469
way that i will reassure parents is you know

00:36:52.469 –> 00:36:54.769
when those came out You know, tacrolimus, for

00:36:54.769 –> 00:36:58.969
instance, a 0 .03 % for kids up to 15, 0 .1 %

00:36:58.969 –> 00:37:02.449
for kids older than 15 and adults. Well, what

00:37:02.449 –> 00:37:05.250
was studied before they were approved, a 0 .3%.

00:37:05.559 –> 00:37:09.559
So an order of magnitude stronger than the weaker

00:37:09.559 –> 00:37:12.159
one that’s been approved for kids. And those

00:37:12.159 –> 00:37:14.500
studies didn’t even show significant absorption

00:37:14.500 –> 00:37:18.320
in the trials that made anyone worry in two -year

00:37:18.320 –> 00:37:21.219
-olds and older. But we’ve just got so much data

00:37:21.219 –> 00:37:22.940
and position papers from American Academy of

00:37:22.940 –> 00:37:25.960
Dermatology and allergists saying that that boxed

00:37:25.960 –> 00:37:29.480
warning was an overreach, which on the one hand,

00:37:29.480 –> 00:37:33.949
I appreciated because it did stop inappropriate,

00:37:34.090 –> 00:37:37.010
off -label, sort of uncontrolled use of these

00:37:37.010 –> 00:37:40.309
products. The flip side was you and I both have

00:37:40.309 –> 00:37:42.510
patients for whom they’re absolutely perfect,

00:37:42.590 –> 00:37:46.150
perfect complements to the topical steroid use,

00:37:46.250 –> 00:37:48.909
if not monotherapy, and yet parents are scared

00:37:48.909 –> 00:37:53.190
by that box warning. Oh, and if you don’t bring

00:37:53.190 –> 00:37:57.130
that warning up before mom reads it on the

00:37:57.130 –> 00:38:00.269
box from the pharmacist, you have lost that patient.

00:38:00.409 –> 00:38:03.030
I think more often than not, they’re done. “How

00:38:03.030 –> 00:38:05.429
come Dr. Krakowski didn’t tell me this could

00:38:05.429 –> 00:38:09.170
cause lymphoma?” Right. Yeah. So that’s a five

00:38:09.170 –> 00:38:12.469
to 10 minute discussion. And that adds up if

00:38:12.469 –> 00:38:14.170
you’re doing it six to eight times a day. And

00:38:14.170 –> 00:38:16.389
it’s just “in the trenches” pediatric dermatology.

00:38:17.690 –> 00:38:21.349
Exactly right. Rob, how do you use a referral

00:38:21.349 –> 00:38:24.530
to an allergist for these severe patients? Specifically,

00:38:25.869 –> 00:38:29.170
How do you partner with them? How do you maybe

00:38:29.170 –> 00:38:31.989
maintain the same messaging? And how do you use

00:38:31.989 –> 00:38:34.769
the objective test that they might ask for? Skin

00:38:34.769 –> 00:38:39.230
prick or, geez, IgE, RAS, blood testing. Do you,

00:38:39.309 –> 00:38:42.050
I guess, would be a good starting point. Yeah,

00:38:42.130 –> 00:38:44.010
talk about a five to ten minute discussion for

00:38:44.010 –> 00:38:46.969
the box warning with some urine inhibitors. There’s

00:38:46.969 –> 00:38:49.829
your one hour discussion with parents. I brought

00:38:49.829 –> 00:38:52.690
my 600-page allergy report. Would you like to

00:38:52.690 –> 00:38:57.000
read it? Oh my goodness. Yes. Well, I’ll tell

00:38:57.000 –> 00:38:58.940
you, I was super spoiled. One of my first stops

00:38:58.940 –> 00:39:00.559
along the way was at Boston Children’s where

00:39:00.559 –> 00:39:03.880
literally right next door was Dr. Linda Schneider,

00:39:03.920 –> 00:39:06.420
who is just, I’m sure you know, just a wonderful

00:39:06.420 –> 00:39:09.440
pediatric allergist at Boston Children’s. And

00:39:09.440 –> 00:39:12.280
I was just like, wow, why do people find this

00:39:12.280 –> 00:39:14.829
allergy dermatology? discussion is so challenging.

00:39:14.909 –> 00:39:17.010
You just go next door and talk to this brilliant

00:39:17.010 –> 00:39:19.789
woman and she distills it and then you see the

00:39:19.789 –> 00:39:23.090
patient together and it’s so easy. That didn’t

00:39:23.090 –> 00:39:28.769
turn out to be reality. So since I’ve sort of

00:39:28.769 –> 00:39:31.530
been in the weeds with this because it’s a tough

00:39:31.530 –> 00:39:34.579
question. Andrew, as you know, because kids with

00:39:34.579 –> 00:39:37.940
eczema are more likely to have food allergies.

00:39:38.019 –> 00:39:39.780
We’ll just stay there for now. Of course, there

00:39:39.780 –> 00:39:41.139
are environmental allergies. There’s contact

00:39:41.139 –> 00:39:42.719
allergies. There’s all sorts of things. But they’re

00:39:42.719 –> 00:39:44.739
more likely to have food allergies, for instance.

00:39:45.800 –> 00:39:47.440
Especially the severe ones is what we’re looking

00:39:47.440 –> 00:39:49.360
at. Exactly. Especially the severe ones. And

00:39:49.360 –> 00:39:53.610
the challenge is… That is true, but oftentimes

00:39:53.610 –> 00:39:56.289
they’re “co-passengers.” One doesn’t cause the

00:39:56.289 –> 00:39:58.909
other. And there’s not this food that’s hidden

00:39:58.909 –> 00:40:01.690
in the environment or the diet that the parents,

00:40:01.849 –> 00:40:04.570
you know, what is eczema for a parent? It is

00:40:04.570 –> 00:40:08.570
utter loss of control. It is watching their child

00:40:08.570 –> 00:40:12.030
be miserable, lose sleep, get infections every

00:40:12.030 –> 00:40:14.050
other day when they’re doing everything they

00:40:14.050 –> 00:40:16.530
can to prevent that. And it just keeps happening.

00:40:16.670 –> 00:40:19.960
And what can they control? Their diet. And they’ve

00:40:19.960 –> 00:40:21.780
got, oh, well, yeah, their food allergies are

00:40:21.780 –> 00:40:23.800
more common. This is what I control. Let’s restrict

00:40:23.800 –> 00:40:27.480
the diet. Let’s beat every allergy bush we can

00:40:27.480 –> 00:40:30.239
to see if that’s the problem. Sometimes it is,

00:40:30.300 –> 00:40:33.360
but more often than not, it’s not. And so that’s

00:40:33.360 –> 00:40:36.639
just a challenging thing to say, okay, let’s…

00:40:37.039 –> 00:40:39.639
And maybe this gets back to your sort of comment

00:40:39.639 –> 00:40:41.440
about if you don’t bring up the box warning,

00:40:41.559 –> 00:40:42.800
you’re going to be dismissed. And you should

00:40:42.800 –> 00:40:46.079
be by that patient. If a parent comes in with

00:40:46.079 –> 00:40:47.780
a child and they’re like, I think this is food

00:40:47.780 –> 00:40:50.860
allergies. And I’ve taken history. There’s not

00:40:50.860 –> 00:40:53.119
really a clear temporal link between any food

00:40:53.119 –> 00:40:55.820
exposure and a flare. There may be not even a

00:40:55.820 –> 00:40:58.579
very atopic family. Just this kid has eczema.

00:40:58.659 –> 00:41:02.119
So I’m not really thinking very much that allergies

00:41:02.119 –> 00:41:04.320
playing a big role there. But the parents are

00:41:04.320 –> 00:41:07.699
really invested in it. thing I’m gonna say is

00:41:07.699 –> 00:41:11.119
oh no that’s silly let’s forget about that I’m

00:41:11.119 –> 00:41:12.840
gonna say for the reasons I just said I actually

00:41:12.840 –> 00:41:14.539
don’t think that’s probably playing a big role

00:41:14.539 –> 00:41:16.800
here but that’s let’s set that aside for now

00:41:16.800 –> 00:41:19.239
let’s not forget about it let’s set that aside

00:41:19.239 –> 00:41:22.860
and do A, B, C, D for your skin and come back without

00:41:22.860 –> 00:41:26.219
changing your diet But doing all these good things

00:41:26.219 –> 00:41:29.579
for the skin. And it’s amazing how often kids

00:41:29.579 –> 00:41:32.119
will come back. And if the parents see that and

00:41:32.119 –> 00:41:33.820
know they haven’t changed the diet, that’s the

00:41:33.820 –> 00:41:36.260
best allergy test there is. Because the prick

00:41:36.260 –> 00:41:38.699
test, the RAS test, good tests, informative,

00:41:38.900 –> 00:41:41.320
can sometimes provide a roadmap. There are also,

00:41:41.380 –> 00:41:43.460
as you well know, a lot of false positives there.

00:41:43.880 –> 00:41:46.659
And then you’ve got this child who is tolerating,

00:41:46.659 –> 00:41:48.900
let’s just say, dairy. So you take your history.

00:41:49.000 –> 00:41:50.519
No, they don’t seem to react when you take dairy.

00:41:50.619 –> 00:41:52.719
But boy, I’ve heard dairy is a common allergy

00:41:52.719 –> 00:41:55.730
in less tests. You get a test. It says, oh, RAS

00:41:55.730 –> 00:41:57.550
test positive, Prick test positive for dairy.

00:41:57.829 –> 00:42:00.030
Child still has bad eczema. Well, let’s take

00:42:00.030 –> 00:42:02.130
the dairy out. Well, if you take the dairy out

00:42:02.130 –> 00:42:05.369
long enough, you can cause a dairy allergy. The

00:42:05.369 –> 00:42:08.349
gut needs to see that protein to continue to

00:42:08.349 –> 00:42:11.489
develop tolerance. And so testing is not always

00:42:11.489 –> 00:42:13.869
just information. There can be a sharp edge to

00:42:13.869 –> 00:42:17.969
that as well. Yeah, I totally agree with you

00:42:17.969 –> 00:42:21.809
on that. For me, patch testing, I don’t. I’m

00:42:21.809 –> 00:42:23.550
sure you guys do that at Seattle Children’s.

00:42:23.550 –> 00:42:26.570
We have a pretty robust patch testing program.

00:42:26.929 –> 00:42:31.269
And I do sometimes get surprised when I find

00:42:31.269 –> 00:42:33.510
something that wouldn’t normally be clinically

00:42:33.510 –> 00:42:35.670
relevant. But geez, it’s there. And you sometimes

00:42:35.670 –> 00:42:38.489
do eliminate that and get some improvement. But

00:42:38.489 –> 00:42:43.650
from an allergy perspective, we have basically

00:42:43.650 –> 00:42:47.909
stopped recommending. the RAS testing. I just

00:42:47.909 –> 00:42:50.809
don’t find that it’s that useful. If to your

00:42:50.809 –> 00:42:53.349
point about the false positives, unless actually

00:42:53.349 –> 00:42:56.869
I’ll take a step back. If, if you’re, if by RAS

00:42:56.869 –> 00:43:00.949
testing, you’re not allergic to your dog, then

00:43:00.949 –> 00:43:02.869
I can say, geez, Fido has nothing to do with

00:43:02.869 –> 00:43:04.570
this. Get that out of your head. You know, that

00:43:04.570 –> 00:43:07.909
to me is useful, but otherwise I a hundred percent

00:43:07.909 –> 00:43:12.090
agree with you that there is no greater test.

00:43:12.860 –> 00:43:15.539
For is your child truly allergic to something

00:43:15.539 –> 00:43:19.079
then? Or I should say, is your eczema being driven

00:43:19.079 –> 00:43:22.619
by an allergy to something? Then let’s treat

00:43:22.619 –> 00:43:24.900
this eczema and prove to you without you doing

00:43:24.900 –> 00:43:28.559
anything else that the eczema can get better.

00:43:28.719 –> 00:43:31.599
And man, when that happens, something magical,

00:43:31.699 –> 00:43:33.519
you can see it in the parents’ faces. Again,

00:43:33.619 –> 00:43:37.019
it’s usually moms. Just take a, they breathe

00:43:37.019 –> 00:43:39.559
a. sigh of deep, deep relief that they don’t

00:43:39.559 –> 00:43:41.940
have to change everything. And that guilt, right?

00:43:42.000 –> 00:43:44.320
The guilt of, geez, could breastfeeding be causing

00:43:44.320 –> 00:43:47.199
this? I can’t even imagine what that would feel

00:43:47.199 –> 00:43:52.320
like. And it’s exhausting. And they get that

00:43:52.320 –> 00:43:53.980
off their chest – literally and figuratively,

00:43:54.000 –> 00:43:58.579
I guess – but yeah, interesting. So we’re very

00:43:58.579 –> 00:44:00.659
similar in that regards to how we approach that.

00:44:01.559 –> 00:44:04.579
Shifting gears a little bit to talk about management.

00:44:06.000 –> 00:44:08.920
We’re going to get to systemic therapies. Any

00:44:08.920 –> 00:44:12.719
tips or tricks that you have for your approach

00:44:12.719 –> 00:44:17.800
to optimizing topical therapies? Do you do wet

00:44:17.800 –> 00:44:22.159
wraps? Are you using bleach baths? Are you doing

00:44:22.159 –> 00:44:24.179
anything else that we should be thinking about

00:44:24.179 –> 00:44:27.800
before we move into discussion around using truly

00:44:27.800 –> 00:44:31.219
a systemic therapy? Yeah, for sure. And I love

00:44:31.219 –> 00:44:33.659
the way that you sort of led into topical therapy

00:44:33.659 –> 00:44:37.880
by including baths and moisturizers, not just

00:44:37.880 –> 00:44:42.079
leaping to medicines because it is the foundation

00:44:42.079 –> 00:44:45.139
of care for eczema. And that includes even when

00:44:45.139 –> 00:44:48.360
we talk about systemic therapies, continuing

00:44:48.360 –> 00:44:51.239
to moisturize and hydrate skin is really important.

00:44:51.599 –> 00:44:54.619
And it’s another area we were just talking about,

00:44:54.619 –> 00:44:57.519
the confusion surrounding allergy and its role

00:44:57.519 –> 00:45:00.900
in atopic dermatitis. Well, parents come in completely

00:45:00.900 –> 00:45:04.280
flummoxed about the role of bathing and moisturization

00:45:04.280 –> 00:45:06.880
with regard to atopic dermatitis, specifically

00:45:06.880 –> 00:45:10.280
bathing in particular. You know, they’ve read

00:45:10.280 –> 00:45:12.780
or been told that by one person that bathing

00:45:12.780 –> 00:45:15.960
is good, you should bathe every day for their

00:45:15.960 –> 00:45:17.780
child with eczema. They may have seen an equally

00:45:17.780 –> 00:45:20.480
reputable source who said, oh my gosh, your child

00:45:20.480 –> 00:45:22.420
has eczema? You should bathe them as little as

00:45:22.420 –> 00:45:25.210
possible, once a week or less. And so the first

00:45:25.210 –> 00:45:27.409
thing I try to do is say that neither of your

00:45:27.409 –> 00:45:30.510
sources, whoever told you A or B, even though

00:45:30.510 –> 00:45:33.429
they’re diametrically opposing viewpoints, are

00:45:33.429 –> 00:45:36.110
necessarily wrong. Again, trying to not, you

00:45:36.110 –> 00:45:38.269
know, a patient comes to me or to you, a specialist.

00:45:39.099 –> 00:45:41.139
And we throw their pediatrician under the bus.

00:45:41.579 –> 00:45:43.500
We’re throwing ourselves under the bus. That’s

00:45:43.500 –> 00:45:46.219
just stupid because they have a trusted source

00:45:46.219 –> 00:45:48.539
who they will continue their relationship with.

00:45:48.679 –> 00:45:50.719
And so we have to embrace that and integrate

00:45:50.719 –> 00:45:53.239
ourselves into that. And so what I’ll say is

00:45:53.239 –> 00:45:55.179
that is not wrong. What they told you is not

00:45:55.179 –> 00:45:59.340
wrong. However, here is… Here’s the key part.

00:45:59.480 –> 00:46:01.980
And oftentimes you can point to a child, especially

00:46:01.980 –> 00:46:05.059
a severe infant, because oftentimes they’ll have

00:46:05.059 –> 00:46:07.579
their cheeks are red right around their chest

00:46:07.579 –> 00:46:10.159
where they drools. It’s all red and itchy, patchy

00:46:10.159 –> 00:46:12.920
everywhere. And sometimes now babies with eczema

00:46:12.920 –> 00:46:15.280
can get diaper rash too. But sometimes you take

00:46:15.280 –> 00:46:18.369
off the diaper and it’s pristine. Or you look

00:46:18.369 –> 00:46:20.909
under the axilla…pristine. And those places,

00:46:20.969 –> 00:46:22.710
I always tell the parents, you know, look at

00:46:22.710 –> 00:46:25.329
your child. Look what the skin likes. It likes

00:46:25.329 –> 00:46:29.730
moisture. Now, it may be more to do with the

00:46:29.730 –> 00:46:32.409
microbial flora in those areas that’s keeping

00:46:32.409 –> 00:46:35.130
it so pristine. I don’t know. But I will use

00:46:35.130 –> 00:46:37.869
that as a teaching point to say, however you

00:46:37.869 –> 00:46:42.619
accomplish hydration. The skin barrier with eczema

00:46:42.619 –> 00:46:46.900
is leaky. Water escapes. Bacteria and allergens

00:46:46.900 –> 00:46:49.460
get in. We need to help that barrier because

00:46:49.460 –> 00:46:52.460
it’s not as competent while they’re having active

00:46:52.460 –> 00:46:55.860
severe eczema. So how we incorporate a bath is

00:46:55.860 –> 00:47:00.269
you bathe and… If you’re in a bath long enough,

00:47:00.309 –> 00:47:02.590
your fingertips get wrinkly, whether you’re in

00:47:02.590 –> 00:47:06.070
a pool, a river, an ocean. If you’re in the water

00:47:06.070 –> 00:47:08.190
long enough, your fingertips get wrinkly because

00:47:08.190 –> 00:47:10.809
that’s very thick skin, and you can sort of see

00:47:10.809 –> 00:47:13.530
the hydration, but water is soaking in your whole

00:47:13.530 –> 00:47:15.769
body. You just see it on the palms and soles.

00:47:15.789 –> 00:47:18.369
Use that as a timer. If you’re in long enough

00:47:18.369 –> 00:47:21.519
for those fingertips to wrinkle, get out within

00:47:21.519 –> 00:47:23.659
reason. It doesn’t have to be so exact as that,

00:47:23.780 –> 00:47:26.659
but within reason, get out, pat dry, and more

00:47:26.659 –> 00:47:30.219
importantly, before they unwrinkle, moisturize.

00:47:30.460 –> 00:47:33.539
The so-called “soak and seal.” If you do that

00:47:33.539 –> 00:47:37.019
and the parents find that bathing and soaking

00:47:37.019 –> 00:47:40.420
and sealing once a day is best, wonderful. If

00:47:40.420 –> 00:47:42.880
they tell me, boy, I did that and my child seemed

00:47:42.880 –> 00:47:44.980
to do better when I bathe them once a week, soak

00:47:44.980 –> 00:47:47.699
and seal, but I moisturize every other day. Wonderful.

00:47:47.900 –> 00:47:52.280
I try not to be too dogmatic about how often

00:47:52.280 –> 00:47:54.260
they bathe. Because number one, it’s not easy

00:47:54.260 –> 00:47:57.699
necessarily. Life happens. And that’s another

00:47:57.699 –> 00:48:00.380
guilt trip saying, oh, you must bathe your child

00:48:00.380 –> 00:48:02.420
every day. And maybe it actually is not the best

00:48:02.420 –> 00:48:04.780
thing for that child. Eczema is nothing if not

00:48:04.780 –> 00:48:07.239
an individual disease. There are these bedrock

00:48:07.239 –> 00:48:10.099
principles we’re talking about. But then the

00:48:10.099 –> 00:48:12.420
parents are the experts in their child’s skin.

00:48:12.460 –> 00:48:14.780
And they use these principles to sort of cobble

00:48:14.780 –> 00:48:19.639
together an action plan. Yeah, I would agree

00:48:19.639 –> 00:48:23.960
with that completely. I have in my mind, if you

00:48:23.960 –> 00:48:27.940
can get a good moisturizer onto that kid two,

00:48:28.019 –> 00:48:30.480
three times a day, I mean, I might be even asking

00:48:30.480 –> 00:48:33.320
too much, but I don’t really care about the bathing

00:48:33.320 –> 00:48:35.460
principles. Although I think I’ve changed a little

00:48:35.460 –> 00:48:40.320
bit in the sense that I don’t know about Seattle,

00:48:40.500 –> 00:48:42.900
but Bethlehem, and there’s a lot of reasons for

00:48:42.900 –> 00:48:45.489
it. It’s a big wrestling community. We have a

00:48:45.489 –> 00:48:50.150
lot of Staph aureus here. And people have looked

00:48:50.150 –> 00:48:52.610
at it. It’s a little higher than the normal what

00:48:52.610 –> 00:48:57.309
you would expect. So for me, a lot of our patients

00:48:57.309 –> 00:49:00.889
are colonized at least. Some of them are super

00:49:00.889 –> 00:49:04.949
infected with Staph aureus. So for me, that mechanical

00:49:04.949 –> 00:49:08.190
act of just getting some of that load off the

00:49:08.190 –> 00:49:11.510
skin is useful. So I have found myself more than

00:49:11.510 –> 00:49:15.820
not recommending once a day, short, five minute,

00:49:15.920 –> 00:49:19.599
lukewarm, get out of there. And then very importantly,

00:49:19.699 –> 00:49:22.139
to your point, moisturize. You got to soak and

00:49:22.139 –> 00:49:25.219
seal. You got to get that moisturizer on. I don’t

00:49:25.219 –> 00:49:30.119
know. Does that jive with, am I okay doing that?

00:49:30.599 –> 00:49:36.079
Oh, 100%. So to now feel the space to be honest

00:49:36.079 –> 00:49:39.960
and open about my practice, I recommend bathing

00:49:39.960 –> 00:49:43.079
once a day, soak and smear. Didn’t want there

00:49:43.079 –> 00:49:44.579
all of a sudden to be technical difficulties

00:49:44.579 –> 00:49:47.440
and my mic was cut. So I wanted to make sure

00:49:47.440 –> 00:49:50.880
that that was coherent with your practice. But

00:49:50.880 –> 00:49:54.460
the point being is not one size fits all. But

00:49:54.460 –> 00:49:56.239
yes, that’s exactly what I do. And that’s one

00:49:56.239 –> 00:49:58.119
of the reasons I do it. And that also gets another

00:49:58.119 –> 00:50:02.440
maybe… place we may or may not align is the

00:50:02.440 –> 00:50:04.860
use of bleach baths um you alluded to them a

00:50:04.860 –> 00:50:08.340
bit ago and i do recommend them um as a potential

00:50:08.340 –> 00:50:13.599
adjunct um to treating and and the That raises

00:50:13.599 –> 00:50:15.340
so many questions with, you know, some of our

00:50:15.340 –> 00:50:17.460
parents have three PhDs. And so they’re asking,

00:50:17.500 –> 00:50:18.960
what’s the mechanism? How does that work? What

00:50:18.960 –> 00:50:21.280
happened? And, you know, the concentrations we

00:50:21.280 –> 00:50:24.480
use in bleach baths don’t even kill staff in

00:50:24.480 –> 00:50:27.639
the water. But what they do is they are a non

00:50:27.639 –> 00:50:30.559
-steroidal anti -inflammatory treatment, no matter

00:50:30.559 –> 00:50:32.960
how counterintuitive that sounds, by putting

00:50:32.960 –> 00:50:35.179
bleach in the bath. And so it matters how you

00:50:35.179 –> 00:50:37.079
do it. You know, for me, the formula is half

00:50:37.079 –> 00:50:40.199
a teaspoon per gallon. Take a regular bath. At

00:50:40.199 –> 00:50:42.800
the end, I have them rinse off. get out, pat

00:50:42.800 –> 00:50:45.599
dry, moisturize. I have them do it once to twice

00:50:45.599 –> 00:50:47.340
a week, but if they’re doing better on the days

00:50:47.340 –> 00:50:49.340
after the bleach bath than the days before, they

00:50:49.340 –> 00:50:52.179
can do it more often. And it just gets at that

00:50:52.179 –> 00:50:55.769
idea. You know, Bethlehem, we… absolutely

00:50:55.769 –> 00:50:57.949
have this Staph carriage issue that you alluded

00:50:57.949 –> 00:51:00.650
to there. And I’ll sort of describe for parents

00:51:00.650 –> 00:51:04.329
that Staph aureus is like gasoline on the fire

00:51:04.329 –> 00:51:07.250
of the eczema. It doesn’t cause it, but it certainly

00:51:07.250 –> 00:51:09.630
drives it along and then can get to a point where

00:51:09.630 –> 00:51:11.590
there’s a conflagration and you actually have

00:51:11.590 –> 00:51:13.409
oral antibiotics, you have an infection. But

00:51:13.409 –> 00:51:17.769
when it’s just just carriage, you need to address

00:51:17.769 –> 00:51:19.329
that as part of the treatment. And that’s one

00:51:19.329 –> 00:51:21.090
of the reasons that the bleach baths are so helpful.

00:51:21.610 –> 00:51:23.309
Yeah. And I think one of the things you said

00:51:23.309 –> 00:51:25.590
that’s most important to call out is the need

00:51:25.590 –> 00:51:27.909
to rinse off with fresh water after the bleach

00:51:27.909 –> 00:51:30.789
bath. I have I’ve had some patients not do that.

00:51:30.869 –> 00:51:34.289
And you get dry, probably drier than you would

00:51:34.289 –> 00:51:35.989
be without the bleach baths from the chlorine.

00:51:37.030 –> 00:51:40.110
Painfully, my two boys are swimmers and we’re

00:51:40.110 –> 00:51:42.309
in the middle of summer swim right now. And both

00:51:42.309 –> 00:51:45.889
of them are developing xerosis (“dryness”) from.

00:51:46.320 –> 00:51:49.300
being in the water. One of them showers right

00:51:49.300 –> 00:51:51.659
after he gets out of the pool, The other comes

00:51:51.659 –> 00:51:55.619
home about 15-20 minutes later and is supposed to

00:51:55.619 –> 00:51:58.480
shower. Most of the time he does but man even

00:51:58.480 –> 00:52:01.239
good moisturizers when you’re putting them on

00:52:01.239 –> 00:52:04.320
that sort of cracked dry skin they can sting

00:52:04.320 –> 00:52:06.800
and that’s been an issue for my boys so i can

00:52:06.800 –> 00:52:10.460
imagine what having moderate, severe, open, cracked

00:52:10.460 –> 00:52:12.820
eczema skin, some of those products that we’re

00:52:12.820 –> 00:52:14.579
asking our patients to use, especially like a

00:52:14.579 –> 00:52:17.039
steroid, topical steroid, where we know stinging

00:52:17.039 –> 00:52:19.519
is going to occur. It must really be an issue

00:52:19.519 –> 00:52:22.420
for them. So yeah, rinsing off as quickly as

00:52:22.420 –> 00:52:24.559
possible and then moisturizing as quickly as

00:52:24.559 –> 00:52:26.420
possible after the bleach bath, I find to be

00:52:26.420 –> 00:52:30.179
very helpful and to mitigate that. Agree. So

00:52:30.179 –> 00:52:33.920
how has your approach to systemic therapy for

00:52:33.920 –> 00:52:36.659
your severe atopic dermatitis patients changed

00:52:36.659 –> 00:52:41.440
in the last… five to 10 years. How’s that for

00:52:41.440 –> 00:52:45.179
a way? Changed a wee bit. Changed a wee bit.

00:52:45.519 –> 00:52:49.300
Well, I’ll just give you a sort of a very simple

00:52:49.300 –> 00:52:52.460
way to describe how much it’s changed. When we

00:52:52.460 –> 00:52:54.500
did our first atopic dermatitis guidelines for

00:52:54.500 –> 00:52:57.679
the AAD in 2004, we met for six hours in a hotel

00:52:57.679 –> 00:53:04.320
and we were done. in 2014 took a little longer

00:53:04.320 –> 00:53:08.440
still in 2014 so from 2000 when all we were just

00:53:08.440 –> 00:53:10.539
talking about the topical calcineurin inhibitors

00:53:10.539 –> 00:53:14.679
2000 2001 when they came out to 2017 there was

00:53:14.679 –> 00:53:18.480
not a single novel molecule for atopic dermatitis

00:53:18.480 –> 00:53:20.659
that came out there were me too topical steroids

00:53:20.659 –> 00:53:22.980
and things like that but not a single novel molecule

00:53:22.980 –> 00:53:28.260
in 2017 dupilumab (Dupixent) came out uh for adults

00:53:28.260 –> 00:53:31.059
it’s since been approved we’ve been one of the

00:53:31.260 –> 00:53:33.599
sites of the pediatric trials for all the age

00:53:33.599 –> 00:53:35.980
groups went down to 12 went down to six years

00:53:35.980 –> 00:53:39.760
now down to six months of age a biologic injectable

00:53:39.760 –> 00:53:41.900
medication depending on the age once a month

00:53:41.900 –> 00:53:45.760
or twice a month uh for moderate to severe atopic

00:53:45.760 –> 00:53:47.679
dermatitis the kind of kids we’re talking about

00:53:47.679 –> 00:53:51.039
patients we’re talking about and it’s 100% revolutionized

00:53:51.039 –> 00:53:55.159
my my treatment because prior to 2017 what was

00:53:55.159 –> 00:53:58.500
the only systemic medication approved for this

00:53:58.500 –> 00:54:02.320
patient population oral systemic steroids. So

00:54:02.320 –> 00:54:05.619
exactly what we don’t want to use if we can help

00:54:05.619 –> 00:54:07.840
it. So, and why is that? That’s actually worth,

00:54:07.880 –> 00:54:10.019
I was glad that you brought that up because I

00:54:10.019 –> 00:54:13.219
was going to be going to start with that one.

00:54:13.300 –> 00:54:16.460
So why, why don’t we like that? Yeah, it’s right.

00:54:16.599 –> 00:54:20.039
It’s seductively effective, isn’t it? Good word.

00:54:21.199 –> 00:54:26.860
It is just not a chronic intervention and atopic

00:54:26.860 –> 00:54:30.320
dermatitis is a chronic intervention. Systemic

00:54:30.320 –> 00:54:32.820
steroids chronically can have significant side

00:54:32.820 –> 00:54:36.960
effects, bony impacts, infection, on down the

00:54:36.960 –> 00:54:41.219
line. And I use the term seductive because we’ve

00:54:41.219 –> 00:54:42.980
already described these families who are losing

00:54:42.980 –> 00:54:45.780
sleep, getting infections, all sorts of things.

00:54:46.510 –> 00:54:49.550
a day or two of oral steroids. And my goodness,

00:54:49.690 –> 00:54:52.449
it’s like a different kid. They’re sleeping like

00:54:52.449 –> 00:54:55.789
a baby. They are not infected. They are looking

00:54:55.789 –> 00:54:58.769
like a million bucks, not itching. The problem

00:54:58.769 –> 00:55:01.670
is when that course ends, whether it’s five days

00:55:01.670 –> 00:55:04.610
later or three weeks later, it’s just going to

00:55:04.610 –> 00:55:07.030
come rolling right back. Sometimes so-called

00:55:07.030 –> 00:55:09.630
“rebound” – sometimes worse than it was before.

00:55:09.969 –> 00:55:13.650
And so there are times when I’ve got a kid who

00:55:13.650 –> 00:55:16.150
is so inflamed, head to toe, everything. stings

00:55:16.150 –> 00:55:19.369
just like you said so the things we need to use

00:55:19.369 –> 00:55:23.750
to recover uh are not there sometimes i will

00:55:23.750 –> 00:55:26.849
have to use the steroids briefly to calm them

00:55:26.849 –> 00:55:29.949
down so we can use the more sustainable therapies

00:55:29.949 –> 00:55:32.849
so i i will not say that i never use systemic

00:55:32.849 –> 00:55:37.079
steroids but but i try not to And prior to 2017,

00:55:37.440 –> 00:55:40.059
that was it. That’s all we had. We had non -steroidal

00:55:40.059 –> 00:55:42.500
options like cyclosporine and methotrexate, but,

00:55:42.559 –> 00:55:44.820
you know, those are pretty heavy-hitting medicines,

00:55:44.900 –> 00:55:47.760
and I still use them too sometimes. But since

00:55:47.760 –> 00:55:52.619
2017, we had for the first time an FDA -approved

00:55:52.619 –> 00:55:55.760
non -steroidal intervention, systemic intervention

00:55:55.760 –> 00:55:58.940
for atopic dermatitis. That was dupilumab, dupixin.

00:55:58.980 –> 00:56:03.480
Since then, there are other biologics, tralokinumab,

00:56:03.679 –> 00:56:07.280
lebrikizumab. nemolizumab – lots of “MABs” – all of

00:56:07.280 –> 00:56:10.760
these “monoclonal antibodies” (MABs) that treat

00:56:10.760 –> 00:56:14.059
eczema. There are small molecules, so -called

00:56:14.059 –> 00:56:19.260
JAK inhibitors approved. So those are oral once

00:56:19.260 –> 00:56:22.280
a day agents for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

00:56:22.360 –> 00:56:25.340
So a whole different landscape. And so, yeah,

00:56:25.400 –> 00:56:27.960
100 % different than I used to use five, 10 years

00:56:27.960 –> 00:56:32.500
ago. If I came to your clinic. tomorrow as a

00:56:32.500 –> 00:56:34.980
patient of yours, do you have sort of an a la

00:56:34.980 –> 00:56:38.500
carte? And let’s just assume I have severe, moderate

00:56:38.500 –> 00:56:41.079
to severe atopic dermatitis that has been recalcitrant

00:56:41.079 –> 00:56:42.960
to all the topical interventions we’ve mentioned.

00:56:43.519 –> 00:56:49.639
Do you have sort of a a la carte go -to in your

00:56:49.639 –> 00:56:51.820
mind of what you would start with and how you

00:56:51.820 –> 00:56:54.880
would work from there? Yeah, I guess first of

00:56:54.880 –> 00:56:57.840
all, if you came to my clinic tomorrow, I’d say,

00:56:57.880 –> 00:57:01.800
I’m sorry, Andrew, you’re way too old. I feel

00:57:01.800 –> 00:57:05.440
like I’m 16, Rob. I’d have to send you down the

00:57:05.440 –> 00:57:09.639
road. I’m so sorry. However, I take your point.

00:57:09.719 –> 00:57:13.099
If a patient came to my… My clinic, a pediatric

00:57:13.099 –> 00:57:16.719
patient, yes, indeed. By far, again, I’m a pediatric

00:57:16.719 –> 00:57:18.860
provider, so this doesn’t necessarily translate

00:57:18.860 –> 00:57:25.099
to the first -line approach to adult patients,

00:57:25.239 –> 00:57:30.699
but my first go -to is dupilumab. Why? It’s been

00:57:30.699 –> 00:57:32.480
around the longest, so we have the longest track

00:57:32.480 –> 00:57:35.179
record. It’s approved down to six months of age.

00:57:35.239 –> 00:57:37.139
None of the others are. All the other systemic

00:57:37.139 –> 00:57:39.019
medications, the youngest age of approval is

00:57:39.019 –> 00:57:42.699
12 years of age. One of the oral JAK inhibitors

00:57:42.699 –> 00:57:44.559
is approved down to two years of age in Europe,

00:57:44.679 –> 00:57:47.280
but not in the United States. So I’m comfortable

00:57:47.280 –> 00:57:50.139
using these things off -label other than dupilumab

00:57:50.139 –> 00:57:52.320
when I need to. But to answer your question,

00:57:52.400 –> 00:57:56.829
that is my first go -to. Don’t need to check

00:57:56.829 –> 00:57:59.650
blood tests to monitor it like we do some medications.

00:57:59.829 –> 00:58:02.010
So even though it’s an injection, which is never

00:58:02.010 –> 00:58:05.429
a wonderful thing to hear for a pediatric patient,

00:58:05.530 –> 00:58:07.610
that their treatment’s going to be a shot. It

00:58:07.610 –> 00:58:10.650
can be as little as once a month, as much as

00:58:10.650 –> 00:58:13.190
twice a month. So it’s not that frequent. We

00:58:13.190 –> 00:58:16.190
have ways of making it more tolerable. So that’s

00:58:16.190 –> 00:58:19.230
sort of where I start. But then absolutely have

00:58:19.230 –> 00:58:23.090
patients on all of those other medications. What

00:58:23.090 –> 00:58:25.349
are some of those specific? interventions that

00:58:25.349 –> 00:58:28.690
you mentioned or alluded to for the shots for

00:58:28.690 –> 00:58:30.429
giving the shots what’s uh what are some of your

00:58:30.429 –> 00:58:33.909
tricks yeah but in terms of systemic medications

00:58:33.909 –> 00:58:37.309
or oh just anything that makes the patient more

00:58:37.309 –> 00:58:39.949
at ease with having or giving themselves the

00:58:39.949 –> 00:58:44.349
injection oh gotcha yeah of course so um first

00:58:44.349 –> 00:58:46.750
of all i’ll sort of we’ll kind of go through

00:58:46.750 –> 00:58:48.449
sort of the mechanics of it so it’s something

00:58:48.449 –> 00:58:51.340
that’s done at home So kids don’t like shots,

00:58:51.460 –> 00:58:53.179
period, but they also don’t like going to the

00:58:53.179 –> 00:58:55.619
doctor and getting shot. So we can reassure that

00:58:55.619 –> 00:58:57.139
it’s something done at home. Of course, then

00:58:57.139 –> 00:58:58.960
the parents are the worried ones, not the kids,

00:58:59.099 –> 00:59:01.119
because they’re not always so thrilled about

00:59:01.119 –> 00:59:04.380
that idea. But we talk about some really important

00:59:04.380 –> 00:59:07.420
things to make it hurt less. Number one, the

00:59:07.420 –> 00:59:09.219
medicine’s got to be at room temperature, so

00:59:09.219 –> 00:59:11.320
you’ve got to let it warm up, number one. Number

00:59:11.320 –> 00:59:13.480
two, we always try to figure out a way so the

00:59:13.480 –> 00:59:15.880
child’s comfortable and feels like there’s some

00:59:15.880 –> 00:59:18.039
element of control, and a lot of times that’s

00:59:18.039 –> 00:59:22.449
a child hugging one parent if this family is

00:59:22.449 –> 00:59:25.030
able to have two people give the shot at the

00:59:25.030 –> 00:59:27.170
same time that’s a luxury not all families have

00:59:27.170 –> 00:59:31.409
but if they do one parent sort of or one one

00:59:31.409 –> 00:59:35.269
helper hold the child while the legs are sticking

00:59:35.269 –> 00:59:39.030
out on the other side and we can put ice for

00:59:39.030 –> 00:59:41.469
about five ten seconds before to cool off the

00:59:41.469 –> 00:59:45.289
surface and then give the injection you can also

00:59:46.670 –> 00:59:48.929
Use Emla cream, numbing cream, for about half

00:59:48.929 –> 00:59:52.190
an hour before. And then the ice. Those two things

00:59:52.190 –> 00:59:54.530
can be done together. And then finally, you can

00:59:54.530 –> 00:59:57.389
do all of those things. And then someone proximal

00:59:57.389 –> 01:00:00.110
to the shot. So if the shot’s being given, say,

01:00:00.170 –> 01:00:03.210
mid -thigh, a little higher up on that same thigh,

01:00:03.469 –> 01:00:06.309
you can sort of tickle or scratch or use a vibratory

01:00:06.309 –> 01:00:08.369
device. There’s something in pediatrics called

01:00:08.369 –> 01:00:10.849
a Buzzy Bee” that literally is just a vibratory

01:00:10.849 –> 01:00:13.309
device that you use to sort of stimulate that

01:00:13.309 –> 01:00:16.900
skin proximal to the shot. confuses the pain

01:00:16.900 –> 01:00:19.179
fibers such that it just doesn’t hurt as much.

01:00:19.320 –> 01:00:22.219
Yeah, that’s exactly what we do. I might add

01:00:22.219 –> 01:00:26.739
that I dole out lollipops like I’m a pro -diabetes

01:00:26.739 –> 01:00:29.860
physician in the clinic. But I find that that

01:00:29.860 –> 01:00:33.219
little burst of sucrose right before the shot

01:00:33.219 –> 01:00:38.320
is given is a good distractor. But yeah, everything

01:00:38.320 –> 01:00:41.099
that you just mentioned, I try to incorporate

01:00:41.099 –> 01:00:44.179
into giving the shots. And I find that The vast

01:00:44.179 –> 01:00:47.300
majority of patients are happier being able to

01:00:47.300 –> 01:00:49.559
do that at home without coming in to see us,

01:00:49.659 –> 01:00:52.360
disrupting their lives. And then when you add

01:00:52.360 –> 01:00:54.920
to that the fact that the medicine works, it’s

01:00:54.920 –> 01:00:57.900
a real, I mean, it’s as close to a miracle as

01:00:57.900 –> 01:01:02.599
probably I’ve seen since Hemangeol for hemangiomas,

01:01:02.659 –> 01:01:05.039
which is the first real game changer that I’ve

01:01:05.039 –> 01:01:07.000
ever witnessed in medicine. So that’s kind of

01:01:07.000 –> 01:01:09.969
cool. The funny thing about Dupixent is – and

01:01:09.969 –> 01:01:12.130
I don’t know if it was hubris or because I was

01:01:12.130 –> 01:01:16.949
a scaredy cat – but I would say it took it really

01:01:16.949 –> 01:01:22.329
two years for me before I jumped on the bandwagon,

01:01:22.369 –> 01:01:25.070
you know, to use it. I just, I didn’t like the

01:01:25.070 –> 01:01:27.429
idea that it was an injection. And I just didn’t,

01:01:27.429 –> 01:01:30.889
I couldn’t get past the idea that, that a, my

01:01:30.889 –> 01:01:35.199
topical regimen couldn’t do it. That was probably

01:01:35.199 –> 01:01:37.920
the hubris part of it. And then, geez, what is

01:01:37.920 –> 01:01:40.599
this systemic medicine going to do? Is it going

01:01:40.599 –> 01:01:43.260
to cause these people to grow flippers or horns?

01:01:43.420 –> 01:01:49.199
And to your point, 18, 12, 6, 6 months. Geez,

01:01:49.300 –> 01:01:53.559
okay, no labs necessary. And people are walking

01:01:53.559 –> 01:01:56.900
into clinic that I saw just a couple months ago

01:01:56.900 –> 01:02:01.199
with severe disease. They’re now clear. You know,

01:02:01.219 –> 01:02:03.320
it’s amazing. And I have to give I have to say

01:02:03.320 –> 01:02:05.460
I have to give my private practice physicians

01:02:05.460 –> 01:02:11.300
a big hurrah on that one, because I think they

01:02:11.300 –> 01:02:13.639
might be a little faster to go to those newer

01:02:13.639 –> 01:02:15.659
medicines because the patients are seeing them

01:02:15.659 –> 01:02:18.599
on the commercials, which we can argue are not

01:02:18.599 –> 01:02:21.679
really helpful. But for in this case, they might

01:02:21.679 –> 01:02:25.280
be. And then because those adults were getting.

01:02:26.379 –> 01:02:29.400
Dupixent faster, sort of a trickle down. I would

01:02:29.400 –> 01:02:31.699
hear about it and go, geez, I, maybe I need to

01:02:31.699 –> 01:02:34.260
open my mind up to be a little bit more receptive

01:02:34.260 –> 01:02:37.199
to using a systemic medicine like that. And geez,

01:02:37.260 –> 01:02:40.739
that was five years ago. And now it’s to, to

01:02:40.739 –> 01:02:43.360
your point, it’s our, it’s our go -to for when,

01:02:43.420 –> 01:02:45.880
when everything else fails and you need a systemic

01:02:45.880 –> 01:02:49.280
therapy. It’s pretty amazing. Yeah, I completely

01:02:49.280 –> 01:02:51.800
agree. One thing I’ve always been interested

01:02:51.800 –> 01:02:54.159
in, and I haven’t really found anybody who does

01:02:54.159 –> 01:02:57.719
this yet. But to me, mechanistically, it seems

01:02:57.719 –> 01:03:01.260
like it works, would be if you had a patient,

01:03:01.300 –> 01:03:04.539
especially one with severe itch, who came in.

01:03:04.980 –> 01:03:09.039
And from your experience, how long do you give

01:03:09.039 –> 01:03:12.480
Dupixent before you start to expect it to work?

01:03:12.800 –> 01:03:15.559
Is there a number that you can kind of throw

01:03:15.559 –> 01:03:19.110
out? Yeah, I’ll usually tell parents that, you

01:03:19.110 –> 01:03:21.710
know, two, three weeks they will start to see

01:03:21.710 –> 01:03:24.309
some improvement. But if you look at sort of

01:03:24.309 –> 01:03:26.630
the curves in the studies, it’s a good two, three

01:03:26.630 –> 01:03:28.869
months before they start to plateau out at their

01:03:28.869 –> 01:03:32.719
peak effect. But I’ve had kids, and I think this

01:03:32.719 –> 01:03:35.639
may also be a bit of the psychology of it, because

01:03:35.639 –> 01:03:37.920
they come back and it has worked. And they’re

01:03:37.920 –> 01:03:40.860
like, the first shot, it worked after two or

01:03:40.860 –> 01:03:43.599
three days. And maybe it did. But I think it’s

01:03:43.599 –> 01:03:47.079
also, finally, something has worked. And so the

01:03:47.079 –> 01:03:51.360
mind sort of might change the time stamp a little

01:03:51.360 –> 01:03:54.219
bit. But it’s usually, you know, two weeks in

01:03:54.219 –> 01:03:56.539
there, they’re like, okay, I’m starting to feel

01:03:56.539 –> 01:03:58.719
it. I’m itching less and my skin’s less red.

01:03:59.019 –> 01:04:01.619
Yeah, agreed. And so one of the things I always

01:04:01.619 –> 01:04:04.320
thought was that, so sort of, okay, Dupixent

01:04:04.320 –> 01:04:07.260
with its safety profile and lack of blood work

01:04:07.260 –> 01:04:12.219
being not necessary to do blood work. Have you

01:04:12.219 –> 01:04:15.480
ever used a JAK inhibitor to “bridge” them onto

01:04:15.480 –> 01:04:17.599
Dupixent? And that’s just something I haven’t

01:04:17.599 –> 01:04:20.260
seen anybody do, but it makes sense because as

01:04:20.260 –> 01:04:23.500
I understand it, those JAKs are faster acting,

01:04:23.659 –> 01:04:26.420
a little bit better maybe for itch specifically.

01:04:26.840 –> 01:04:30.550
And could you get them? two three months bridged

01:04:30.550 –> 01:04:32.610
on to do pixen and then have the pixen carry

01:04:32.610 –> 01:04:35.909
the the rest of the way yeah absolutely i mean

01:04:35.909 –> 01:04:37.670
we used to do that with cyclosporine, right? we

01:04:37.670 –> 01:04:40.309
did it and it did work and it worked quicker than

01:04:40.309 –> 01:04:42.989
methotrexate, six, seven weeks, eight weeks.

01:04:43.110 –> 01:04:47.389
So we used to use cyclosporine to bridge patients

01:04:47.389 –> 01:04:50.050
to a more sustainable therapy, still do sometimes.

01:04:50.829 –> 01:04:54.929
And the theory behind that absolutely is right

01:04:54.929 –> 01:04:57.190
with JAK inhibitors. JAK inhibitors, I have had

01:04:57.190 –> 01:05:01.110
kids say literally a day or two, I’m itching

01:05:01.110 –> 01:05:04.300
less. It’s remarkable. The reason I don’t is

01:05:04.300 –> 01:05:07.300
because the folks in my office who work on prior

01:05:07.300 –> 01:05:12.980
authorizations might fire me. So one new medicine

01:05:12.980 –> 01:05:16.599
at a time for my crowd. Yeah, that’s the practical

01:05:16.599 –> 01:05:19.000
realities of not being able to do everything

01:05:19.000 –> 01:05:22.739
we necessarily want to do for the patients. So

01:05:22.739 –> 01:05:25.119
when Dupixent is not working in those rare cases

01:05:25.119 –> 01:05:28.639
when it doesn’t, how do you broach that with

01:05:28.639 –> 01:05:31.380
the patient? Where kind of do you go after that?

01:05:32.569 –> 01:05:35.130
Yeah, there’s some interesting sort of discussions

01:05:35.130 –> 01:05:37.869
on both ends of this spectrum. So the kids in

01:05:37.869 –> 01:05:39.769
the question you asked, the ones who don’t work,

01:05:39.929 –> 01:05:43.030
where do we go? And then the kids for whom it

01:05:43.030 –> 01:05:45.309
does work, what’s the end point? So that’s another

01:05:45.309 –> 01:05:49.360
really sort of… unclear um discussion but with

01:05:49.360 –> 01:05:51.599
regard to the question you asked i’ll usually

01:05:51.599 –> 01:05:54.599
say let’s give it a good three months um exactly

01:05:54.599 –> 01:05:56.260
for the reasons we talked about it that’s sort

01:05:56.260 –> 01:05:57.920
of when the curve starts to peak and if you’re

01:05:57.920 –> 01:06:00.699
just seeing nothing then like we talked about

01:06:00.699 –> 01:06:03.699
before step back why um it works for most why

01:06:03.699 –> 01:06:07.860
not this kid um and are they using it is there

01:06:07.860 –> 01:06:09.900
another diagnosis do we need to think about all

01:06:09.900 –> 01:06:13.980
those things great do that but let’s say We got

01:06:13.980 –> 01:06:15.780
the right diagnosis. They’re using it appropriately.

01:06:15.800 –> 01:06:17.579
It just isn’t the right medicine. What do we

01:06:17.579 –> 01:06:20.780
do? That’s when, for me, the next step is typically

01:06:20.780 –> 01:06:25.139
a JAK inhibitor. There are other, so getting

01:06:25.139 –> 01:06:27.880
back to your word mechanistically, so Dupixent

01:06:27.880 –> 01:06:33.860
works IL -4, IL -13. There are two new agents,

01:06:34.119 –> 01:06:36.559
Tralokinumab, Lebrikizumab, which are IL -13

01:06:36.559 –> 01:06:40.610
agents. I haven’t necessarily… looked in that

01:06:40.610 –> 01:06:42.789
direction because the mechanisms are similar.

01:06:43.210 –> 01:06:46.090
That isn’t necessarily proven that they wouldn’t

01:06:46.090 –> 01:06:48.610
respond, but I would generally think of either

01:06:48.610 –> 01:06:51.869
Nemolizumab, which is anti IL-31, a different mechanism,

01:06:51.989 –> 01:06:54.469
or one of the JAK inhibitors, which is a very

01:06:54.469 –> 01:06:56.829
different mechanism. Are you finding that you

01:06:56.829 –> 01:06:59.690
can get those accepted by insurance companies?

01:06:59.809 –> 01:07:02.010
I’m striking out most of the time with those.

01:07:02.130 –> 01:07:04.489
It’s a struggle for sure. They have to be 12

01:07:04.489 –> 01:07:08.739
or older. strikes a lot of my kids who are younger

01:07:08.739 –> 01:07:12.159
than 12 because off -label almost never am I

01:07:12.159 –> 01:07:17.400
able to. But I do have a number of kids older

01:07:17.400 –> 01:07:21.380
than 12 on mostly JAK inhibitors because the

01:07:21.380 –> 01:07:24.500
others are newer, but a few kids on Lebrikizumab

01:07:24.500 –> 01:07:28.840
and Tralokinumab and a few kids on Nemo. And

01:07:28.840 –> 01:07:33.460
either concurrently or separate from, what role

01:07:33.460 –> 01:07:36.699
do you… I don’t know if you know this living

01:07:36.699 –> 01:07:39.460
in Seattle, but there is a thing called the Sun.

01:07:39.599 –> 01:07:41.219
Now, we haven’t seen it much in Pennsylvania

01:07:41.219 –> 01:07:42.719
the last four weeks. How do you find that place?

01:07:43.139 –> 01:07:45.440
Yeah, yeah. You got to look up, but it’s there.

01:07:45.860 –> 01:07:49.760
And so when you don’t have access to 10 minutes

01:07:49.760 –> 01:07:52.260
a day of sun, sometimes we’ll use phototherapy.

01:07:53.559 –> 01:07:57.659
Wow. Yeah, I know. Do you even use phototherapy

01:07:57.659 –> 01:08:01.519
much these days? I do. I mean, we do a lot of

01:08:01.519 –> 01:08:05.519
it, actually. Not a lot. The challenge for us

01:08:05.519 –> 01:08:07.679
is we don’t have a phototherapy unit at our hospital,

01:08:07.780 –> 01:08:11.300
so we have to send them elsewhere. Now the University

01:08:11.300 –> 01:08:12.860
of Washington is right here. Our adult colleagues

01:08:12.860 –> 01:08:16.760
are right there, and they will treat kids to

01:08:16.760 –> 01:08:19.840
a certain age, and it’s sort of variable, but

01:08:19.840 –> 01:08:23.899
definitely not younger than six. And so we don’t

01:08:23.899 –> 01:08:25.819
use it a lot. My challenges with phototherapy

01:08:25.819 –> 01:08:31.399
are both logistical, insurance approval. The

01:08:31.399 –> 01:08:34.260
frequency of the need having to go in so often

01:08:34.260 –> 01:08:36.760
is a real logistical barrier for a lot of parents.

01:08:37.239 –> 01:08:39.359
And then a lot of times it’s a matter of the

01:08:39.359 –> 01:08:41.420
kids I most, most want to treat are those super

01:08:41.420 –> 01:08:43.939
inflamed kids. And oftentimes I have to kind

01:08:43.939 –> 01:08:45.880
of calm them down before phototherapy can kind

01:08:45.880 –> 01:08:48.300
of be, like we said, bridge them to the phototherapy.

01:08:48.420 –> 01:08:51.039
But I do and I have and I will, just not often.

01:08:51.439 –> 01:08:55.079
Do you ever use a medicine like Dupixent in combination

01:08:55.079 –> 01:08:58.359
with phototherapy or is that taboo? Yeah. No,

01:08:58.439 –> 01:09:00.439
no. I absolutely could do that. And I’ve used

01:09:00.439 –> 01:09:03.060
Dupixan in combination with methotrexate and

01:09:03.060 –> 01:09:07.239
other systemics. So I have done that. Yes. Yeah.

01:09:07.279 –> 01:09:10.979
Yeah. We use phototherapy oftentimes with the

01:09:10.979 –> 01:09:12.880
other systemics and usually with good effect.

01:09:12.960 –> 01:09:15.739
One thing to your point about the just practical

01:09:15.739 –> 01:09:17.640
nature of not coming in two to three times a

01:09:17.640 –> 01:09:20.399
week for… It’s only a couple of minutes, but

01:09:20.399 –> 01:09:23.119
it’s still just a nuisance. We’ve been very lucky.

01:09:23.180 –> 01:09:25.079
And I don’t know, maybe the insurance companies

01:09:25.079 –> 01:09:27.460
did the math and they just figured out it’s cheaper.

01:09:27.600 –> 01:09:32.300
But we’ve been very good at getting at -home

01:09:32.300 –> 01:09:35.300
units approved for our patients in this area,

01:09:35.340 –> 01:09:37.680
way more than any other place I’ve ever lived

01:09:37.680 –> 01:09:39.659
or worked. I don’t know if that’s a thing out

01:09:39.659 –> 01:09:42.859
in Seattle, but they’ve been, you know, for $6

01:09:42.859 –> 01:09:45.619
,000, you can… basically get a pretty decent

01:09:45.619 –> 01:09:47.180
at -home therapy of course you have to have a

01:09:47.180 –> 01:09:48.840
place to put it and it’s usually in the living

01:09:48.840 –> 01:09:52.180
room for for the family but um that’s that’s

01:09:52.180 –> 01:09:54.039
really done wonders for for some of these kids

01:09:54.039 –> 01:09:57.479
who need it yeah and i think you’re right i have

01:09:57.479 –> 01:09:59.819
a handful of kids with home units for sure and

01:09:59.819 –> 01:10:01.439
i think it is i can’t remember that study was

01:10:01.439 –> 01:10:03.600
like after three months you’re like paying it’s

01:10:03.600 –> 01:10:05.699
paid for itself the home unit so i think insurance

01:10:05.699 –> 01:10:09.119
companies see that yeah what do you think dr

01:10:09.119 –> 01:10:11.600
sidberry is on the horizon next couple years

01:10:11.600 –> 01:10:15.109
what are we going to see Oh, boy. There’s the

01:10:15.109 –> 01:10:17.189
National Eczema Association, which, as you know,

01:10:17.210 –> 01:10:20.050
is a wonderful advocacy group for patients with

01:10:20.050 –> 01:10:22.550
eczema, families with eczema. I’d highly recommend

01:10:22.550 –> 01:10:24.649
anyone listening to your program who’s not visited.

01:10:24.789 –> 01:10:27.489
I think it’s nationaleczema.org or something

01:10:27.489 –> 01:10:29.689
like that, but just Google “National Eczema Association.”

01:10:29.869 –> 01:10:33.109
You’ll find it. It has a page, a research page,

01:10:33.270 –> 01:10:37.319
and it lists all of the agents that are at

01:10:37.319 –> 01:10:39.840
certain stages of approval. So clinical trials,

01:10:39.859 –> 01:10:41.479
right? You got phase one, phase two, phase three,

01:10:41.520 –> 01:10:44.760
all of the things that are phase three or beyond.

01:10:44.899 –> 01:10:47.590
So that’s… that’s getting close to being a

01:10:47.590 –> 01:10:49.909
medicine that the FDA can look at and approve

01:10:49.909 –> 01:10:53.270
or not approve. And it is ridiculous. They’re

01:10:53.270 –> 01:10:56.949
like double -digit injectables, double -digit

01:10:56.949 –> 01:11:01.390
orals, double -digit topicals coming down the

01:11:01.390 –> 01:11:05.430
road. So I think additional MABS, as we’ve talked

01:11:05.430 –> 01:11:08.770
about, will be on the way. Probably additional

01:11:08.770 –> 01:11:11.909
JAK inhibitors. Some therapies that are sort

01:11:11.909 –> 01:11:13.989
of looking through a little bit different lens,

01:11:14.109 –> 01:11:16.930
maybe going back to the microbiome, some interesting

01:11:16.930 –> 01:11:19.569
topical and systemic therapies trying to address

01:11:19.569 –> 01:11:22.729
the cutaneous microbiome and its role that we’ve

01:11:22.729 –> 01:11:26.850
sort of alluded to in sustaining and triggering

01:11:26.850 –> 01:11:29.369
atopic dermatitis. So I think that’s probably

01:11:29.369 –> 01:11:32.670
where we’re headed. Also, with all these medicines

01:11:32.670 –> 01:11:34.449
we already have, including the ones that are

01:11:34.449 –> 01:11:37.229
to come, sort of personalized medicine. That’s

01:11:37.229 –> 01:11:41.869
sort of the vanguard, where we’re headed. perhaps

01:11:41.869 –> 01:11:44.449
seeing the genetics of a patient and then matching

01:11:44.449 –> 01:11:47.729
that to a certain medication if those studies

01:11:47.729 –> 01:11:50.949
come out and so direct us. Or Emma Gutman, MD in

01:11:50.949 –> 01:11:54.510
New York has done wonderful studies sort of characterizing

01:11:54.510 –> 01:11:57.489
the so -called inflammatory signature of eczema.

01:11:57.649 –> 01:12:00.010
And this patient with chronic eczema has more

01:12:00.010 –> 01:12:03.590
of that cytokine or that cytokine. And boy, let’s

01:12:03.590 –> 01:12:06.369
not try that IL -31 because there wasn’t much

01:12:06.369 –> 01:12:09.630
of that in that patient’s biopsy. Let’s try the

01:12:09.630 –> 01:12:11.619
other one. So things like… that i think are

01:12:11.619 –> 01:12:14.380
where we’re headed yes i i think they’re doing

01:12:14.380 –> 01:12:16.920
something similar for psoriasis out of Yale i

01:12:16.920 –> 01:12:20.920
saw and um geez i maybe i’m speaking for both

01:12:20.920 –> 01:12:24.840
of us i will not be sad uh the day that eczema

01:12:25.180 –> 01:12:27.659
gets cured. It would be a wonderful thing for

01:12:27.659 –> 01:12:30.460
everybody involved. Hopefully, we’ll see that

01:12:30.460 –> 01:12:33.300
in my lifetime as a practicing pediatric dermatologist.

01:12:33.460 –> 01:12:37.340
But certainly, it’s better to have eczema now

01:12:37.340 –> 01:12:41.039
in 2025 than it was, as we talked about, just

01:12:41.039 –> 01:12:43.520
five to 10 years ago. What a difference that

01:12:43.520 –> 01:12:46.920
short amount of time relative to our careers

01:12:46.920 –> 01:12:52.149
really leads to. So anyway. Great speaking with

01:12:52.149 –> 01:12:54.210
you, Dr. Robert Sidbury, Chief of Pediatric

01:12:54.210 –> 01:12:56.430
Dermatology at Seattle Children’s Hospital. Really

01:12:56.430 –> 01:12:58.689
do appreciate the time. It’s just an amazing

01:12:58.689 –> 01:13:02.430
resource to have you here and speaking to us

01:13:02.430 –> 01:13:04.510
and our audience. Thank you so much for taking

01:13:04.510 –> 01:13:06.789
the time. It’s a pleasure. Thanks for having

01:13:06.789 –> 01:13:12.109
me. Thanks for tuning in to this episode of the

01:13:12.109 –> 01:13:14.189
Don’t Be Rash Pediatric Dermatology Podcast.

01:13:14.779 –> 01:13:17.079
I’m your host, Dr. Andrew Krakowski. Don’t forget

01:13:17.079 –> 01:13:19.279
to subscribe to our show on your favorite podcast

01:13:19.279 –> 01:13:23.180
platform and check out don’tberash .org for more

01:13:23.180 –> 01:13:25.560
information. A special thank you to our nonprofit

01:13:25.560 –> 01:13:28.319
sponsor, the St. Luke’s University Health Network

01:13:28.319 –> 01:13:30.939
for making this episode possible. Until next

01:13:30.939 –> 01:13:33.899
time, remember, keep calm and don’t be rash.

Mission

We seek to be your most trusted source of evidence-based, experience-driven education about children’s skin conditions.

Introduction

Join internationally-recognized pediatric dermatologist, Dr. Andrew C. Krakowski, as he and his kid-focused dermatology colleagues discuss their expert approach from everything from your infant’s stubborn cradle cap and baby acne to your teenager’s color-changing mole and keloid scar. Tune in to hear when a “lump and bump” could be concerning and when it might just be a normal kid thing. Discuss common misconceptions about kids’ skin and dispel the myths standing in the way of truly healthy skin. Learn what skincare products are legit and which are mostly hype.

No Insta-influencers and self-appointed experts here. Just “Dr. K” and his renowned team of skin experts!

THE INFORMATION AND CONTENT PROVIDED ON OR ACCESSED THROUGH THIS WEBSITE ARE INTENDED FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND NOT INTENDED TO BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ADVICE, DIAGNOSIS, OR TREATMENT. ALWAYS SEEK THE ADVICE OF YOUR PHYSICIAN OR OTHER QUALIFIED HEALTHCARE PROVIDER WITH ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE REGARDING A MEDICAL CONDITION.

THE USE OF THIS WEBSITE AND/OR ANY COMMUNICATION VIA THE WEBSITE OR EMAIL DOES NOT CREATE A PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP. ALWAYS SEEK THE ADVICE OF A PHYSICIAN OR OTHER QUALIFIED HEALTHCARE PROVIDER PRIOR TO STARTING ANY NEW TREATMENT, SELECTING A METHOD OF TREATMENT, OR SEEKING ANSWERS TO ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING A MEDICAL CONDITION. NOTHING CONTAINED ON OR ACCESSED THROUGH THIS WEBSITE IS INTENDED TO BE AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OR TREATMENT. USERS OF THIS WEBSITE SHOULD NEVER DISREGARD PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ADVICE OR DELAY IN SEEKING TREATMENT BASED ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON OR ACCESSED THROUGH THIS WEBSITE.

BY PROVIDING THIS WEBSITE OR ANY INFORMATION OR CONTENT, NEITHER DON’T BE RASH NOR ITS PARENT OR AFFILIATE COMPANIES (COLLECTIVELY “DON’T BE RASH”) ARE ENGAGED IN THE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE, NURSING, OR THE PROVISION OF ANY HEALTH CARE SERVICE.

For further details please refer to the Terms of Use.

Scroll to Top